Claims
Losses Primary Driver of Medical Liability Hikes
Losses on medical liability claims have been the chief cause
of the dramatic increases in medical liability premiums over
the past three years, according to a General Accounting Office
(GAO) report
released last week. To conduct the study, the GAO analyzed
the changes in the medical liability markets in seven states—California,
Florida, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and
Texas—since 1999. Although reduced investment income
and increasing reinsurance costs have played a factor in the
large premium increases, the GAO found, losses on claims was
the primary driver. The agency recommended that the National
Association of Insurance Commissioners and state insurance
regulators “identify and collect additional, mutually
beneficial data necessary for evaluating the medical malpractice
insurance market.”
FDA
Warns Biotronik on Failure to Recall ICDs
The FDA has issued a warning letter to Biotronik, Inc. for
failing to initiate a recall of two of its ICDs after the
company issued a “Dear Doctor” letter in March
about abnormal charging times potentially associated with
the devices. During an April inspection, the warning
letter explains, the FDA found that Biotronik had sent
a March 21 letter to physicians who had implanted the Belos
VR and Belos VR-T ICDs advising them to immediately schedule
a follow-up visit with each patient to check for an abnormal
charging time (16 seconds). If an abnormal charging time was
detected, the company advised that “the device should
be replaced immediately because the full programmed energy
may not be delivered.” This action should have prompted
a class II recall, the FDA said, because the device may cause
temporary adverse health consequences.
Medicare
Conferees Making Slow Progress, Long Road Still Predicted
The conference committee working to resolve differences between
the House- and Senate-passed Medicare reform packages has
reached agreements on ACC-supported measures that will ease
the regulatory burden on physicians. But Democrats and Republicans
continue to be at odds over a prescription drug benefit, leading
some to predict the conference committee’s work could
drag on until the holidays. In related news, the Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) has revised its estimate of the cost of
a provision in the House bill that would provide coverage
of treatment for Medicare patients participating in “breakthrough”
medical device trials. According to a Health News Daily
report, AdvaMed, which represents device manufacturers, helped
to convince the CBO to revise its estimate from $4 billion
to $700 million over 10 years. In its comments
to the conference committee, the ACC expressed its opposition
to this provision unless it was amended to ensure that the
coverage expansion would not be funded through reductions
in Medicare fees for other procedures.
Final
Inpatient Rule Provides Slight Increase in Drug-Eluting Stent
Payments
The final 2004 Medicare hospital inpatient payment
regulation released last week includes an average increase
of 3.5 percent in facility payments and contains few changes
for cardiovascular services. The CMS did not significantly
change payment rates for cardiac catheterization procedures
with drug-eluting stents, despite the submission of data by
an independent auditor which showed that Medicare payments
were not covering the full cost of the new devices. The rule
also establishes two DRGs for ICD implantation performed with
or without cardiac catheterization (514 and 515, respectively),
and included codes for heart failure treatment in neonates.
Mass.
Blues Plan To Pay $16 Million in Performance Bonuses
Primary care physicians participating in a pay-for-performance
program with Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts will
receive $16 million in bonuses in 2003. Under the incentive
program, which was launched in 2000, participating physicians
can earn bonus payments based on how they perform on quality
measures for adult and pediatric care. Among the adult measures
is LDL measurement after a cardiac event. Physicians will
receive half the payment in July and the other half in December.
BCBSMA also launched an incentive program for specialty group
practices this year, with groups measured in three categories:
patient satisfaction and access, quality of care, and cost.
FDA
Weighing Ephedra Ban
The FDA is considering banning the herbal supplement ephedra,
the agency’s commissioner said during a congressional
hearing last week. Banning the supplement—which has
been linked to a number of deaths and other problems, including
myocardial infarction and stroke—“is in the range
of options we are considering,” FDA Commissioner Mark
McClellan, MD, PhD, said before a joint meeting of two House
Energy and Commerce Committee subcommittees. According to
an Associated Press report, McClellan’s statement marks
a reversal from previous FDA claims that it does not have
the authority to ban herbal supplements. A ban could be implemented
if the agency reviews the available evidence and determines
that the supplement is harmful.
Drug
Reimportation Bill Passes House
Despite heavy opposition from the pharmaceutical lobby, the
House, led by Republicans, has passed a bill that would allow
the reimportation of prescription drugs from 25 industrialized
countries. The legislation is aimed at reducing consumers’
drug costs, as the same prescription drugs typically cost
far less in foreign countries than they do in the United States.
The strong GOP support for the bill was surprising because
the Bush administration and House Republican leaders strongly
opposed it. As a “stand-alone” bill, the legislation
appears to have little chance of passing the Senate.
Proponents
of the bill have said that they hope to fold it into the final
Medicare reform package. The pharmaceutical industry, led
by the trade group PhRMA, strongly opposed the legislation,
arguing that it would increase the risk of unsafe counterfeit
drugs entering the country and that it would hurt research
and development through reduced profits.
Advocacy
Weekly is a product of the Advocacy Division of the American
College of Cardiology. Questions or comments regarding this
publication should be directed to the Advocacy Division at
800-435-9203 or to advocacydiv@acc.org. |