BREAKING
NEWS: Medicare Fee Schedule Released
The 2003 Medicare fee schedule was released on Dec. 20 and,
as expected, includes a 4.4 percent reduction in physicians'
Medicare fees. Because of efforts by the ACC, for the first
time in many years, most cardiologists will fare better than
their colleagues by about 1 percent. How individual cardiologists
will be effected, however, depends on their mix of services.
Payments for services provided in the office are scheduled
to fall by about 2 percent and services provided in hospitals
are scheduled to fall about 6 percent. The effective date
of the 2003 fee schedule is March 1. "In the rule we
are announcing today, CMS has done everything it can to shore
up physician payments for 2003, but only Congress has the
authority to fix the formula," said CMS Administrator
Tom Scully. The CMS refined the methodology for calculating
the rate of inflation in providing physicians' services by
adjusting the measure of productivity. As a result, physicians
will see a reduction of 4.4 percent rather than the 5.1 percent
reduction that would have occurred without the change. "These
methodological adjustments translate into an additional $14.5
billion in Medicare payments to physicians over the next 10
years," Scully noted. An ACC analysis of the final rule's
impact on cardiovascular specialists will be available soon.
In addition, members should be receiving a letter from ACC
President Bruce Fye, MD, addressing the fee cuts and how the
College is working to address them.
CMS
Instructs Medicare Carriers To Continue Paying at 2002 Rates
The CMS has instructed Medicare contractors to pay all claims
submitted after Jan. 1, 2003, at 2002 rates, with the exception
of any new 2003 HCPCS codes. The CMS encouraged physicians
not to submit new 2003 HCPCS codes for services performed
until the 2003 Medicare fee schedule takes effect on March
1. Medicare contractors must suspend payment for any claims
submitted after the first of the year that contain new 2003
CPT or HCPCS codes for services paid under the physician fee
schedule. Claims filed with both 2002 and new 2003 codes will
be held until March 1, when the fee schedule becomes effective.
Survey
Seeks Physician Input on Impact of Medicare Cuts
The American Medical Association (AMA) is conducting a Web-based
survey to determine whether Medicare access problems are increasing
for patients because of past and projected payment reductions.
The collected data will be used in the ongoing efforts to
enact legislation to prevent further cuts in physicians' Medicare
fees. Because issues of patient access differ across specialty
lines, it is important that the data reflect the practices
and experiences of all specialties. Physicians who would like
to participate must register on the AMA
Web site and then will receive a copy of the questionnaire
by e-mail.
United
Reverses Course on Inappropriate MPI Payment Policy
United Healthcare has notified the ACC and American Society
of Nuclear Cardiology (ASNC) that it will correct an onerous
reimbursement policy that exists in selected regions. The
current policy only reimbursed for the exercise portion of
myocardial perfusion imaging and not for the rest portion
of the procedure. United based its policy reversal on detailed
information submitted by Greg Thomas, MD, chair of the ASNC
Community Based Practice Committee, about the differences
between these portions of the test.
Member
Feedback Requested on Improper Bundling
As part of an ongoing effort by the ACC to address issues
related to improper/inappropriate bundling by third-party
payers, the College met recently with McKesson Corp., an information
technology company that develops the claims editing software
used by 80 percent of private-sector health plans. McKesson
has expressed a strong interest in learning more about cardiovascular
procedures and what is involved in providing these services
to patients. In response, the ACC is working to identify procedures
that health plans inappropriately bundle into other payments.
ACC members are encouraged to submit examples of improperly
bundled procedures to the College via the ACC
Web site. All information will remain confidential. For
more information, contact Kathy Flood by phone at (301) 897-2607
or via email at kflood@acc.org.
Thompson
Calls for Medical Liability Reform at Fla. Forum
HHS Secretary Tommy Thompson last week called for "common-sense
reform" in medical liability laws. Speaking at a town
hall meeting in Jacksonville, Fla., Thompson said liability
reform is desperately needed in the health care system, the
Florida Times-Union (Jacksonville) reported. Chances
of federal liability reform legislation passing in 2003 are
good, Thompson added. "I think the stars are aligned
correctly." Earlier this year the Bush administration
released a blueprint
for medical liability reform that included caps on damages
in medical malpractice cases and other reforms supported by
the ACC and other physician organizations. Congressional insiders
are predicting that medical liability reform legislation could
pass the House within the first three months of 2003. However,
intense lobbying and grassroots efforts by the physician community
will be necessary if medical liability reform legislation
is to ever reach the president's desk.
DOJ
Orders 1,100-Physician IPA to Dissolve
An 1,100-member independent physician organization in North
Carolina has been ordered by the Justice Department to cease
operations and dissolve for engaging in anticompetitive behavior.
According to the Justice Department, the Ashville-based Mountain
Health Care "restrained price and other forms of competition
among physicians in Western North Carolina by adopting a uniform
fee schedule governing the prices of its participating physicians."
The Justice Department said that physicians and physician
groups in the IPA that normally would have competed with each
other adopted a uniform price schedule and authorized Mountain
Health Care to negotiate with health plans on their behalf.
The result was "higher rates charged to health plans
leading to higher health costs for ultimate consumers."
The order must still be approved in U.S. District Court.
Mass.
BCBS Plan Launches Physician Bonus Initiative
Beginning in January, Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) of
Massachusetts will launch a program through which it will
pay bonuses to physician practices with which it contracts.
Bonuses will be paid based on improvements in quality of care,
ability to control costs, and patient satisfaction. The insurer
already has a more limited quality bonus program in place.
This expansion will initially involve about half of the physicians
who contract with BCBS in the state, with the goal of enrolling
all of its physicians. Some physicians have voiced concern
with the program, the Boston Globe reported, arguing
that money that might normally be allocated to annual increases
in reimbursement will be diverted to bonus paymentssomething
that BCBS admitted could happen.
Public
Report Shows Pa. Hospital Performance Improving
Improvements were seen in in-hospital patient mortality rates
for 10 of 11 common procedures and in hospital length of stay
for 9 of 12 treatment groups, according to a report released
last week by the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment
Council (PHC4). The report is available on the PHC4
Web site and provides hospital-specific information on
facilities' performance in areas such as diagnosing myocardial
infarction and heart failure and angioplasty/stent placement.
Other measures covered in the report include case volume;
risk-adjusted mortality, average length of stay, and readmissions
for any reason; and average charges. Pennsylvania has been
one of the most aggressive states in terms of public reporting
of treatment outcomes. "Hospitals and physicians continue
to improve the quality of care they provide, and the patients
are the winners," said Marc P. Volavka, Executive Director
of PHC4. "The process of public reporting is making a
difference in Pennsylvania."
Advocacy
Weekly will not be published next week. Have a safe and
happy holiday.
Advocacy
Weekly is a product of the Advocacy Division of the American
College of Cardiology. Questions or comments regarding this
publication should be directed to the Advocacy Division
at 800-435-9203 or to advocacydiv@acc.org.
|