CBO
Issues Potentially Damaging Report on Tort Reform
The Congressional
Budget Office reports that restrictions on malpractice
awards will do little to hold down health care spending. In
a report issued January 8, the CBO asserts that even if medical
liability premiums are lowered as a result of restrictions
on tort liability, the direct impact on health care spending
will be minimal because malpractice costs account for less
than 2 percent of all that spending. CBO also contends that
savings from reducing the practice of defensive medicine will
also produce little health care savings. CBO does not, however,
refute evidence by other studies that show that medical liability
premiums are lower in states with tort reform. In fact, CBO
has estimated that medical liability reform legislation similar
to that passed in the House (H.R.5) would lower premiums nationwide
by an average 25 to 30 percent. CBO admits that the economic
efficiencies (maximum possible net benefits to society) that
would be achieved under the medical liability reforms currently
being considered by Congress would depend on the current state
of the liability system.
National
Academy of Sciences Calling for Universal Health Insurance
The United States must guarantee health insurance for every
citizen by 2010 and only major reform at the federal level
will make it happen, says the Institute
of Medicine (IOM) in a report issued January 14. While
the IOM avoids endorsing specific proposals or estimating
costs, it provides five principles to guide the planning process.
Health and Human Services Sec. Tommy Thompson said universal
coverage by 2010 is "not realistic," indicating
that the president would have more to say about the uninsured
in his State of the Union address. Among Democratic presidential
candidates, Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio and Al Sharpton support
a single-payer system for everyone. Others propose more limited
reforms, with Rep. Dick Gephardt of Missouri supporting a
requirement for employers to provide health insurance coverage
to workers.
Health
Care and the 2004 Elections at ACC '04
Will health care be a defining issue in the 2004 elections?
Unquestionably, 2004 election results will shape the health
care debate in the next Congress. Come hear what leading Democratic
and Republican political pollsters Celinda Lake and Ed Goeas
have to say about the presidential election and the hot congressional
races across the country during a first-of-a-kind session
at the ACC Scientific Conference in New Orleans. Hosted by
the ACC Advocacy Division, Health
Care in the 2004 Elections will be held on March 9 from
7-8:15 a.m., in Room 342 of the Morial Convention Center.
The ACC hopes cardiovascular specialists will use this session
as an opportunity to learn more about the races that will
directly impact them. Free coffee and beignets from Café
Du Monde will be served.
Democrats Threaten to Filibuster
FY 2004 Appropriations Bill
A package of appropriations bills for FY 2004 stills needs
to be voted on in the new 2004 legislative session. The bill,
blocked in the Senate in early December, will return to the
floor on January 20. According to Congressional Quarterly,
Democratic leaders are still expected to mount a filibuster
inspired by one change in the omnibus spending package, which
would allocate $328 billion in discretionary appropriations.
House Republicans have threatened not to return to the negotiating
table if the filibuster succeeds and instead might fund discretionary
programs at FY 2003 levels by adopting a year-long continuing
resolution.
Advocacy
Weekly is a product of the Advocacy Division of the American
College of Cardiology. Questions or comments regarding this
publication should be directed to the Advocacy Division at 800-435-9203
or to advocacydiv@acc.org. |