Congress
Passes Medicare Reform, But Help for Physicians Still Not
Certain
Both the House and Senate passed Medicare reform packages
last week, setting up what is likely to be a contentious conference
committee to resolve the differences between the two bills.
The House bill includes a measure that would prevent a projected
4.2 percent cut in physician Medicare payments from taking
effect next year. The provision provides for a 1.5 percent
increase in 2004 and 2005, but, because of cost constraints,
future steep reductions would compensate for those increases
in 2006 and beyond. The Alliance of Specialty Medicine, of
which the ACC is a member, issued a statement urging Congress
to address the physician payment issue in its final conference
agreement. Although both bills have prescription drug benefits
as their cornerstone, the House bill contains greater involvement
by private health insurers—something that is likely
to be a major sticking point in conference. Both bills contain
provisions to provide increased funding to rural health care
providers and new coverage for cholesterol screening.
The
ACC and other physician groups will be targeting the conference
committee to improve upon the existing House physician payment
provision and, ultimately, ensure something to restore physician
payments remains in the bill. ACC members are encouraged to
contact their legislators about this issue and let them know
that they expect their support in preventing further Medicare
cuts. ACC members can easily send a message to their legislators
using the College’s Web-based
grassroots advocacy tool. Go to the ACC
Web site and click on the “Take Action Now”
icon.
ACC
Members Encouraged to Contact Senators to Support Liability
Reform Bill
The Senate is scheduled to formally consider a medical
liability reform bill strongly supported by the ACC and other
physician groups the week of July 7. This bill, the "Patients
First Act," S. 11, is nearly identical to the reform
bill already passed by the House. ACC members are encouraged
to contact their senators and urge them to support S. 11.
Members can easily contact their senators using the ACC's
grassroots advocacy tool on the ACC Web site. Go to www.acc.org
and click on the "Take Action Now" icon.
CMS
Cancels Requirement for Carriers to Obtain Refunds from Physicians
The CMS has cancelled plans to require Medicare carriers
to perform a mass adjustment in July to compensate for physician
overpayments related to the delay in the 2003 Medicare fee
schedule. Because the Medicare physician fee schedule did
not become effective until March 1, 2003, a substantial number
of claims were overpaid for services performed in January
or February but not processed until after March 1, the CMS
said last week. The CMS had previously directed Medicare carriers
to automatically adjust these claims, beginning in July 2003,
and to recover any applicable overpayments. But the CMS told
carriers last week that it was rescinding this directive.
If an overpayment exists, physicians should not receive any
"Demand" letters related to an incorrect payment
based on the delay of the 2003 fee schedule. The CMS also
advised, however, that if physicians bring an overpayment
to a Medicare carrier's attention, the carrier will still
process an adjustment.
ACC
Expresses Concern About ICD-10 Provisions in Medicare Reform
Bill
The Alliance of Specialty Medicine last week urged that clarifications
be included in the House Medicare reform package related to
the adoption of the ICD-10 system in hospitals. In a letter
to House Rules Committee Chair Rep. David Dreier, the Alliance,
of which the ACC is a member, stressed that, as currently
drafted, the bill language could be “misinterpreted
to mean that ICD-10-CM and ICD-10-PCS should also apply to
physician services.” The letter noted that the ICD-10
system is much more complicated than the ICD-9 system used
by physicians for diagnosis reporting for in-patient services,
and that the CPT coding system used to reimburse physicians
and the ICD coding systems are not interchangeable. “We
believe that implementing ICD-10 for physician services would
throw hundreds of thousands of physician practices into administrative
chaos,” the letter warned. “We are asking that
the provision be clarified to specify that the HHS Secretary
could not apply [the ICD-10 system] for physician services,
regardless of site of service.”
Specialists
in Demand, Survey Finds
Cardiologists are in high demand in hospitals across the country,
according to the results of a survey released last week. In
a survey by Merritt, Hawkins, and Associates of hospital physician
recruitment trends, cardiologists were being highly recruited
by hospitals with more than 100 beds, and ranked in the top
five recruited specialists in both mid-size and larger hospitals.
Cardiology ranked third in average salary offered by recruiting
hospitals ($280,000), behind radiology ($317,000) and orthopedics
($315,000). Overall, 85 percent of hospitals that responded
to the survey were actively recruiting physicians, and of
those that were not, more than half planned on doing so in
the next six months.
Despite
Major Concerns, HHS Will Not Delay Implementation Deadline
for Transaction Standards
In the face of concerns within the CMS and among physician
groups, the HHS will not push back the Oct. 16 deadline for
implementation of the HIPAA transactions and code set standards.
Many physician practices have reported serious concerns about
their ability to be compliant by the deadline, largely because
of difficulties with their practice management software. Many
software vendors’ products are not compliant, in large
part because the government has not yet released final guidance
on the transaction and code set regulations. As a result,
practices have not been able to conduct transaction tests
and are concerned that they will not be able to submit appropriate
claims to health plans/payers. Under the regulations, health
plans/payers who make payments for inappropriately submitted
claims could be in violation of the law. According to a Health
News Daily report, CMS Administrator Scully said that
the deadline would not be pushed back, but is considering
offering protection to providers who have made a good faith
effort to be compliant.
Florida
Legislators Struggle for Consensus in Medical Liability Reform
Special Session
A special session of the Florida legislature called
by Gov. Jeb Bush, R, to address medical liability reform legislation
is apparently over. According to a Miami Herald report,
the Florida Senate President Jim King, R, sent Senate members
home, as negotiations over the governor’s reform package
continued to be rocky. As has been the case in many states,
the main sticking point has been noneconomic damage caps.
While Gov. Bush wants a bill that caps noneconomic damages
at $250,000, a proposal strongly supported in the Florida
House, the Senate favors a stronger focus on insurance industry
reforms and a $1.5 million noneconomic damages cap with a
catastrophic exemption as high as $6 million. There has been
some progress in ironing out the 90 differences between the
House and Senate packages, the Herald reported, leading
some legislators to call for passage of a bill now that contains
the agreed upon reforms, while continuing to work on the outstanding
issues. Another special session is scheduled to begin July
8.
FDA
Approves Statin/Aspirin Combo Package
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved
Pravigard PAC (co-packaged pravastatin sodium and buffered
aspirin tablets) for use in patients for whom both pravastatin
(Pravachol) and buffered aspirin is appropriate. Packaging
the two together, the FDA said in a Talk Paper, “may
be more convenient for some patients.” Patients receiving
treatment with Pravigard should also be placed on a standard
cholesterol-lowering diet, the FDA
advised.
CMS
Abandons Plan to Expand Self-Referral Ban, But Legislation
Still a Possibility
The CMS announced last week that it’s dropping its plan
to eliminate a whole-hospital ownership exception in regulations
promulgated under the Stark “self-referral” laws.
The CMS previously had announced that it planned to publish
revised regulations that would limit physician ownership in
hospitals that focus on treatment of one disease, something
that would have a direct impact on so-called heart hospitals.
According to a report in Report on Medicare Compliance,
CMS Administrator Tom Scully said he was uncertain whether
the agency had the regulatory authority to make the change.
An early version of the Senate Medicare reform package, however,
included a provision that would expand prohibitions on physician
referral to specialty hospitals. At press time, it was unclear
whether this provision was in the final bill passed by the
Senate.
Advocacy
Weekly is a product of the Advocacy Division of the American
College of Cardiology. Questions or comments regarding this
publication should be directed to the Advocacy Division at
800-435-9203 or to advocacydiv@acc.org. |