Table of Contents Print a PDF References Figures & Tables
< Previous Next >


Antman et al., Management of Patients With STEMI: Executive Summary
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:671-719

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive Summary

A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society


3. Management Before STEMI


One third of patients who experience STEMI will die within 24 hours of the onset of ischemia, and many of the survivors will suffer significant morbidity (24). For many patients, the first manifestation of CHD will be sudden death. The major risk factors for development of CHD and STEMI are well established. Clinical trials have demonstrated that modification of those risk factors can prevent the development of CHD (primary prevention) or reduce the risk of experiencing STEMI in patients who have CHD (secondary prevention). All practitioners should emphasize prevention and refer patients to primary care providers for appropriate long-term preventive care. In addition to internists and family physicians, cardiologists have an important leadership role in primary (and secondary) prevention efforts.

3.1. Identification of Patients at Risk of STEMI

Class I
1. Primary care providers should evaluate the presence and status of control of major risk factors for CHD for all patients at regular intervals (approximately every 3 to 5 years). (Level of Evidence: C)

2. Ten-year risk (National Cholesterol Education Program [NCEP] global risk) of developing symptomatic CHD should be calculated for all patients who have 2 or more major risk factors to assess the need for primary prevention strategies (59). (Level of Evidence: B)

3. Patients with established CHD should be identified for secondary prevention, and patients with a CHD risk equivalent (e.g., diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or 10-year risk greater than 20% as calculated by Framingham equations) should receive equally intensive risk factor intervention as those with clinically apparent CHD. (Level of Evidence: A)

Major risk factors for developing CHD (i.e., smoking, family history, adverse lipid profiles, and elevated blood pressure) have been established from large long-term epidemiological studies (59,60). These risk factors are predictive for most populations in the United States. Primary prevention interventions aimed at these risk factors are effective when used properly. They can also be costly in terms of primary care physician time, diversion of attention from other competing and important healthcare needs, and expense, and they may not be effective unless targeted at higher-risk patients (61). It is therefore important for primary care providers to make identifying patients at risk, who are most likely to benefit from primary prevention, a routine part of everyone’s health care. The Third Report of the NCEP provides guidance on identifying such patients (59).

Patients with 2 or more risk factors who are at increased 10-year risk will have the greatest benefit from primary prevention, but any individual with a single elevated risk factor is a candidate for primary prevention. Waiting until the patient develops multiple risk factors and increased 10-year risk contributes to the high prevalence of CHD in the United States (59,62). Such patients should have their risk specifically calculated, by any of the several available valid prognostic tools available in print (59,63), on the internet (64), or for use on a personal computer or PDA (Personal Digital Assistant) (59). Patients’ specific risk levels determine the absolute risk reductions they can obtain from preventive interventions and guide selection and prioritization of those interventions. For example, target levels for lipid lowering and for antihypertensive therapy vary by patients’ baseline risk. A specific risk number can also serve as a powerful educational intervention to motivate lifestyle changes (65).

3.2. Interventions to Reduce Risk of STEMI

The benefits of prevention of STEMI in patients with CHD are well documented and of large magnitude (62,66-68). Patients with established CHD should be identified for secondary prevention, and patients with a CHD risk equivalent (e.g., diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, or 10-year risk greater than 20% as calculated by Framingham equations) should receive equally intensive risk factor intervention for high-risk primary prevention regardless of sex (69). Patients with diabetes and peripheral vascular disease have baseline risks of STEMI similar to patients with known CHD, as do patients with multiple risk factors predicting calculated risk of greater than 20% over 10 years as estimated by the Framingham equations (59). Such patients should be considered to have the risk equivalents of CHD, and they can be expected to have an absolute benefit similar to those with established CHD.

All patients who smoke should be encouraged to quit and should be provided with help in quitting at every opportunity. Even a single recommendation by a clinician to quit smoking can have a meaningful impact on the rate of cessation of smoking. The most effective strategies for encouraging quitting are those that identify patients’ level or stage of readiness and provide information, support, and, if necessary, pharmacotherapy targeted at the individual’s readiness and specific needs (66,70). Pharmacotherapy may include nicotine replacement or withdrawal-relieving medication such as bupropion. Most patients require several attempts before succeeding in quitting permanently. Additional discussion in this area can be found in the ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina (71).

All patients should be instructed in and encouraged to maintain appropriate low-saturated-fat and low-cholesterol diets high in soluble (viscous) fiber and rich in vegetables, fruits, and whole grains. The statin drugs have the best outcome evidence supporting their use and should be the mainstay of pharmacological intervention (62). The appropriate levels for lipid management are dependent on baseline risk; the reader is referred to the NCEP report for details (59).

Primary prevention patients with high blood pressure should be treated according to the recommendations of the Seventh Joint National Committee on High Blood Pressure (JNC-7) (72,73). Specific treatment recommendations are based on the level of hypertension and the patient’s other risk factors. A diet low in salt and rich in vegetables, fruits, and low-fat dairy products should be encouraged for all hypertensive patients, as should a regular aerobic exercise program. Most patients will require more than 1 medication to achieve blood pressure control, and pharmacotherapy should begin with known outcome-improving medications (primarily thiazide diuretics as first choice, with the addition of betablockers, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, and long-acting calcium channel blockers) (72,74). Systolic hypertension is a powerful predictor of adverse outcome, particularly among the elderly, and should be treated even if diastolic pressures are normal (75).

Aspirin prophylaxis can uncommonly result in hemorrhagic complications and should only be used in primary prevention when the level of risk justifies it. Patients whose 10-year risk of CHD is 6% or more are most likely to benefit, and aspirin 75 to 162 mg/d as primary prophylaxis should be discussed with such patients (76-79).

3.3. Patient Education for Early Recognition and Response to STEMI

Class I
1. Patients with symptoms of STEMI (chest discomfort with or without radiation to the arms[s], back, neck, jaw, or epigastrium; shortness of breath; weakness; diaphoresis; nausea; lightheadedness) should be transported to the hospital by ambulance rather than by friends or relatives. (Level of Evidence: B)

2. Healthcare providers should actively address the following issues regarding STEMI with patients and their families:
a. The patient’s heart attack risk (Level of Evidence: C)

b. How to recognize symptoms of STEMI (Level of Evidence: C)

c. The advisability of calling 9-1-1 if symptoms are unimproved or worsening after 5 minutes, despite
feelings of uncertainty about the symptoms and fear of potential embarrassment (Level of Evidence: C)

d. A plan for appropriate recognition and response to a potential acute cardiac event, including the phone number to access EMS, generally 9-1-1 (80) (Level of Evidence: C)

3. Healthcare providers should instruct patients for whom nitroglycerin has been prescribed previously to take ONE nitroglycerin dose sublingually in response to chest discomfort/pain. If chest discomfort/pain is unimproved or worsening 5 minutes after 1 nitroglycerin dose has been taken, it is recommended that the patient or family member/friend call 9-1-1 immediately
to access EMS. (Level of Evidence: C)


Morbidity and mortality from STEMI can be reduced significantly if patients and bystanders recognize symptoms early, activate the EMS system, and thereby shorten the time to definitive treatment. Patients with possible symptoms of STEMI should be transported to the hospital by ambulance rather than by friends or relatives, because there is a significant association between arrival at the ED by ambulance and early reperfusion therapy (81-84). In addition, emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics can provide life-saving interventions (e.g., early cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] and defibrillation) if the patient develops cardiac arrest. Approximately 1 in every 300 patients with chest pain transported to the ED by private vehicle goes into cardiac arrest en route (85).

Several studies have confirmed that patients with STEMI usually do not call 9-1-1 and are not transported to the hospital by ambulance. A follow-up survey of chest pain patients presenting to participating EDs in 20 US communities who were either released or admitted to the hospital with a confirmed coronary event revealed that the average proportion of patients who used EMS was 23%, with significant geographic difference (range 10% to 48%). Most patients were driven by someone else (60%) or drove themselves to the hospital (16%) (86). In the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2, just over half (53%) of patients with STEMI were transported to the hospital by ambulance (82).

Even in areas of the country that have undertaken substantial public education on warning signs of STEMI and the need to activate the EMS system rapidly, either there were no increases in EMS use (87-91) or EMS use increased (as a secondary outcome measure) but was still suboptimal, with a 20% increase from a baseline of 33% in all 20 communities in the Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment (REACT) study (92) and an increase from 27% to 41% in southern Minnesota after a community campaign (93). Given the importance of patients using EMS for possible acute cardiac symptoms, communities, including medical providers, EMS systems, healthcare insurers, hospitals, and policy makers at the state and local level, need to have agreed-upon emergency protocols to ensure patients with possible heart attack symptoms will be able to access 9-1-1 without barriers, to secure their timely evaluation and treatment (94).

As part of making a plan with the patient for timely recognition and response to an acute event, providers should review instructions for taking nitroglycerin in response to chest discomfort/pain. If a patient has previously been prescribed nitroglycerin, it is recommended that the patient be advised to take ONE nitroglycerin dose sublingually promptly for chest discomfort/pain. If symptoms are unimproved or worsening 5 minutes after ONE nitroglycerin dose has been taken, it is also recommended that the patient be instructed to call 9-1-1 immediately to access EMS. Although the traditional recommendation is for patients to take 1 nitroglycerin dose sublingually, 5 minutes apart, for up to 3 doses before calling for emergency evaluation, this recommendation has been modified by the writing committee to encourage earlier contacting of EMS by patients with symptoms suggestive of STEMI. Self-treatment with prescription medication, including nitrates, and with nonprescription medication (e.g., antacids) has been documented as a frequent cause of delay among patients with STEMI, including those with a history of MI or angina (95,96). Both the rate of use of these medications and the number of doses taken were positively correlated with delay time to hospital arrival (95).

Family members, close friends, or advocates should be included in these discussions and enlisted as reinforcement for rapid action when the patient experiences symptoms of a possible STEMI (3,80,97) (Figure 4). For patients known to their providers to have frequent angina, physicians may consider a selected, more tailored message that takes into account the frequency and character of the patient’s angina and their typical time course of response to nitroglycerin. Avoidance of patient delay associated with self-medication and prolonged re-evaluation of symptoms is paramount.

Taking an aspirin in response to acute symptoms by patients has been reported to be associated with a delay in calling EMS (86). Patients should focus on calling 9-1-1, which activates the EMS system, where they may receive instructions from emergency medical dispatchers to chew aspirin (162 to 325 mg) while emergency personnel are en route, or emergency personnel can give an aspirin while transporting the patient to the hospital (98). Alternatively, patients may receive an aspirin as part of their early treatment once they arrive at the hospital if it has not been given in the prehospital setting (3).

Providers should target those patients at increased risk for STEMI, focusing on patients with known CHD, peripheral vascular disease, or cerebral vascular disease, those with diabetes, and patients with 10-year Framingham risk of CHD of greater than 20% (99). They should stress that the chest discomfort will usually not be dramatic, such as is commonly misrepresented on television or in the movies as a “Hollywood heart attack.” Providers should also describe anginal equivalents and the commonly associated symptoms of STEMI (e.g., shortness of breath, a cold sweat, nausea, or lightheadedness) in both men and women (83), as well as the increased frequency of atypical symptoms in elderly patients (100).

In September 2001, the NHAAP and the AHA launched a campaign urging patients and providers to “Act in Time to Heart Attack Signs” (101). The campaign urges both men and women who feel heart attack symptoms or observe the signs in others to wait no more than a few minutes, 5 minutes at most, before calling 9-1-1 (101,102). Campaign materials point out that patients can increase their chance of surviving a STEMI by learning the symptoms and filling out a survival plan. They also are advised to talk with their doctor about heart attack and how to reduce their risk of having one. The patient materials include a free brochure about symptoms and recommended actions for survival, in English (103) and Spanish (104), as well as a free wallet card that can be filled in with emergency medical information (105). Materials geared directly to providers include a Patient Action Plan Tablet (106), which contains the heart attack warning symptoms and steps for developing a survival plan individualized with the patient’s name; a quick reference card for addressing common patient questions about seeking early treatment to survive a heart attack (107), including a palm pilot version (108); and a warning signs wall chart (109). These materials and others are available on the “Act in Time” Web page (www.nhlbi.nih.gov/actintime) (51,101) (Figure 5).

 


Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc.

Back to Top | | Copyright © 2008 American College of Cardiology
Heart House | 2400 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037