Table of Contents Print a PDF References Figures & Tables
< Previous Next >


Antman et al., Management of Patients With STEMI: Executive Summary
J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:671-719

ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction—Executive Summary

A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction)

Developed in Collaboration With the Canadian Cardiovascular Society


2. Pathology

2.1. Role of Acute Plaque Change

Slowly accruing high-grade stenoses of epicardial coronary arteries may progress to complete occlusion but do not usually precipitate STEMI, probably because of the development over time of a rich collateral network. However, during the natural evolution of atherosclerotic plaques, especially those that are lipid laden, an abrupt and catastrophic transition may occur, characterized by plaque disruption by rupture of the fibrous cap or erosion of the surface of the fibrous cap (Figure 2) (8-10). Plaques that are prone to disruption are usually nonobstructive, are characterized by abundant macrophages and other inflammatory cells, and are often located at branch points or bends in the arterial tree (11-15). They are referred to as vulnerable or high-risk plaques. After
plaque disruption, there is exposure of substances that promote platelet activation, adhesion, and aggregation, thrombin generation, and ultimately thrombus formation (16,17). The resultant thrombus can completely occlude the epicardial infarct artery. If there is an insufficient collateral supply, a wave front of myocardial necrosis begins within 15 minutes and spreads from the endocardium toward the epicardium (18). This may be modulated by the extent of collateral flow and determinants of myocardial oxygen consumption, affording opportunity for significant myocardial salvage (19). Of note, intravascular ultrasound studies suggest that in addition to the disruptured plaque, several other vulnerable or high-risk plaques may coexist throughout the coronary vasculature.

2.2. Acute Coronary Syndromes

Disruption of vulnerable or high-risk plaques is the common pathophysiological substrate of the acute coronary syndromes that comprise a spectrum of myocardial ischemia. Patients with an acute coronary syndrome include those whose clinical presentations cover the following range of diagnoses: unstable angina, MI without ST elevation (NSTEMI), and MI with ST elevation (STEMI) (Figure 2) (8-10). Patients with STEMI have a high likelihood of a coronary thrombus occluding the infarct artery (20,21). Angiographic evidence of coronary thrombus formation may be seen in more than 90% of patients with STEMI but in only 1% of patients with stable angina and about 35% to 75% of patients with unstable angina or NSTEMI (20-24). However, not every STEMI evolves into a Q-wave MI; likewise, a patient with NSTEMI may develop Q waves. The acute coronary syndrome spectrum concept is a useful framework for developing therapeutic strategies. Antithrombin therapy and antiplatelet therapy should be administered to all patients with an acute coronary syndrome regardless of the presence or absence of ST-segment elevation. Patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation are candidates for reperfusion therapy (either pharmacological or catheter-based) to restore flow promptly in the occluded epicardial infarct-related artery and are the subject of this guideline (Figure 3) (24-40). Patients presenting without ST-segment elevation are not candidates for immediate pharmacological reperfusion but should receive anti-ischemic therapy and catheter-based therapy where applicable as discussed in the ACC/AHA Guidelines for Management of Patients with UA/NSTEMI (4).

2.3. Pathophysiology

A key concept in the pathophysiology of STEMI is ventricular remodeling, a term that refers to changes in size, shape, and thickness of the left ventricle involving both the infarcted and noninfarcted segments of the ventricle (41,42). Acute dilatation and thinning of the area of infarction that is not due to additional myocardial necrosis is referred to as infarct expansion (43). An extra load is placed on the residual functioning myocardium, which results in compensatory hypertrophy. Inhibition of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone sys-tem is a key therapeutic maneuver in patients with STEMI (44). Additional important pathophysiological concepts in patients with STEMI that form the basis for recommendations in this guideline include cardiac arrhythmias such as those that result from electrical instability, pump failure/excessive sympathetic stimulation, and conduction disturbances. Mechanical problems that result from dysfunction or disruption of critical myocardial structures (e.g., mitral regurgitation [MR], rupture of the interventricular septum, ventricular aneurysm formation, and free wall rupture) may require a combination of pharmacological, catheterbased, and surgical treatments.

2.4. Epidemiology

STEMI continues to be a significant public health problem in industrialized countries and is becoming an increasingly significant problem in developing countries (45). Although the exact incidence is difficult to ascertain, using first-listed and secondary hospital discharge data, there were 1 680 000 unique discharges for ACS in 2001 (46). Applying the conservative estimate of 30% of the ACS patients who have STEMI from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction [NRMI-4] (46a), we estimate 500,000 STEMI events per year in the U.S. However, there has been a steady decline in the mortality rate from STEMI over the last several decades. This appears to be due to a combination of a fall in the incidence of MI (replaced in part by an increase in the incidence of unstable angina) and a reduction in the case fatality rate once an MI has occurred (47-49). There has been a progressive increase in the proportion of patients who present with NSTEMI compared with STEMI.

The committee strongly endorses several public health campaigns that are likely to contribute to a reduction in the incidence of and fatality from STEMI in the future. These include the following: 1) recognition of diabetes mellitus and chronic kidney disease as “risk equivalents” to coronary heart disease (CHD) and therefore recommendation for more aggressive attempts at control of other risk factors (50,51); 2) recognition of the importance of dyslipidemia as a major risk factor for CHD and recommendation for aggressive attempts at cholesterol reduction and treatment of the metabolic syndrome (50); 3) aggressive primary prevention efforts at smoking cessation as emphasized by the World Health Organization; 4) patient education campaigns regarding the signs and symptoms of MI and the appropriate courses of action to be taken (52,53); and 5) implementation at a professional level of quality assurance projects such as the ACC’s “Guidelines Applied in Practice” (54) and the AHA’s “Get with the Guidelines” (55) to improve compliance with established treatment strategies when caring for patients with MI. A proposal that holds great promise for reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with STEMI is the regionalization of care for patients with acute coronary syndromes using centers of excellence (56-58).

 


Copyright © 2004 by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc.

Back to Top | | Copyright © 2008 American College of Cardiology
Heart House | 2400 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037