Table of Contents Print a PDF References Figures & Tables
< Previous Next >


BRAUNWALD ET AL., MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA AND NON-ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION UPDATE
http://www.acc.org/clinical/guidelines/unstable/update_index.htm

ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline Update for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina)

This is a Guideline Update of the 2000 Unstable Angina Guidelines. To highlight the changes, deleted text is indicated by strikeout, and revised text is presented in brown. A clean version of the document, with changes fully incorporated, is available for download and print.

Preamble

It is important that members of the medical profession play a significant role in the critical evaluation of the use of diagnostic procedures and therapies in the management and prevention of disease states. Rigorous and expert analysis of the available data that document the relative benefits and risks of those procedures and therapies can produce helpful guidelines that improve the effectiveness of care, optimize patient outcomes, and favorably affect the overall cost of care through a focus of resources on the most effective strategies.

The American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) have jointly engaged in the production of such guidelines in the area of cardiovascular disease since 1980. This effort is directed by the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines, whose charge is to develop and revise practice guidelines for important cardiovascular diseases and procedures. Experts in the subject under consideration are selected from both organizations to examine subject-specific data and to write guidelines.

The process includes additional representatives from other medical practitioner and specialty groups where appropriate. Writing groups are specifically charged to perform a formal literature review, to weigh the strength of evidence for or against a particular treatment or procedure, and to include estimates of expected health outcomes where data exist. Patient-specific modifiers, comorbidities, and issues of patient preference that might influence the choice of particular tests or therapies are considered, as well as frequency of follow-up and cost-effectiveness.

The ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines makes every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that might arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing panel are asked to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.

These practice guidelines are intended to assist physicians in clinical decision making by describing a range of generally acceptable approaches for the diagnosis, management, or prevention of specific diseases or conditions. These guidelines represent an attempt to define practices that meet the needs of most patients in most circumstances. The ultimate judgment regarding the care of a particular patient must be made by the physician and patient in light of all of the available information and the circumstances presented by that patient.

These guidelines were published in the Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Circulation in September 2000. The committee has continuously monitored the literature since the 2000 report to ensure relevancy of its recommendations. The guidelines have been updated in 2002 via the ACC and AHA web sites to include the most significant advances that have occurred in the management of patients with UA/NSTEMI since the 2000 report. A summary article highlighting the changes to the guidelines will be published in a subsequent issue of the Journal of the American College of Cardiology and Circulation. The 2000 guidelines were officially endorsed by the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP)* and the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.

Raymond J. Gibbons, MD, FACC
Chair, ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines

 

Copyright © 2002 by the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc.

 

Back to Top | | Copyright © 2008 American College of Cardiology
Heart House | 2400 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037