Announcing the Results of the Guidelines Applied in Practice Initiatives

Despite the proliferation of clinical practice guidelines in recent years, there's plenty of evidence that there's still a big gap between what guidelines recommend and what health care providers actually do. Last year, the American College of Cardiology (ACC) developed a plan for improving adherence to guidelines. This year, the College can demonstrate the effectiveness of that plan.

"We've shown that we can make guidelines come alive in practice," said Kim Eagle, MD, of the University of Michigan, and principal investigator of the Guidelines Applied in Practice (GAP) Project. Dr. Eagle also chairs the ACC/American Heart Association (AHA) Task Force on Performance Measures. Yesterday, at a special presentation here in Orlando, Dr. Eagle announced the initial results of the first GAP Project.

With the ACC/AHA guideline on acute myocardial infarction as its first target, the College came together in a unique collaboration with the Southeast Michigan Quality Forum Cardiovascular Subgroup of the Greater Detroit Area Health Council and the Michigan Peer Review Organization. Together they developed materials designed to make it easier for hospitals to put the guideline's recommendations into practice. Dr. Eagle then assessed the materials' impact on the care received by more than 800 acute myocardial infarction patients in 10 hospitals in the Detroit area.

The results were striking, Dr. Eagle told the audience. “For virtually all of the key quality indicators we were interested in, we saw either a positive trend or a significant improvement in adherence,” he said. Take smoking-cessation counseling, for example. Before the GAP initiative, only 42 percent of patients’ charts revealed evidence that smokers had been advised to stop smoking. After the project, that figure jumped to 65 percent.

The results were especially impressive for Medicare patients, Dr. Eagle noted. Before GAP, for instance, only 63 percent of Medicare patients received beta blockers within 24 hours of arriving at the hospital; afterward, that figure rose to 73 percent. Similarly, the percentage of patients receiving aspirin within 24 hours rose from 76 percent to 87 percent. The percent of patients who were prescribed aspirin on discharge from the hospital rose from 82 percent to 92 percent.

The key to all of these improvements, explained Dr. Eagle, lies in the “toolkit” developed by the GAP collaborators. The materials included a pocket guideline for physicians, a clinical pathway for nurses, standard orders, chart stickers, and hospital-specific performance charts. Patients received educational materials and signed customized discharge “contracts” outlining their plans for medication use, dietary and lifestyle changes, and medical follow up.

“This may be one of the first quality-improvement initiatives where patients played a big role,” said Dr. Eagle. “The doctor, nurse, and patient are the triangle of care.”

Now the ACC’s GAP Steering Committee hopes to expand the project, Dr. Eagle reported. Possibilities include taking the acute myocardial infarction project statewide in Michigan and developing new projects based on other guidelines. The College also hopes to put the “toolkit” on its Web site for use in other hospitals. “The whole idea is to share as much as we can so that others can take advantage of part or all of this program in their own hospitals,” said Dr. Eagle.

GAP Program  



 

Back to Top | | Copyright © 2008 American College of Cardiology
Heart House | 2400 N Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037