HFrEF with persistent NYHA class III symptoms despite optimal GDMT is the correct answer choice, as it aligns with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved criteria and randomized controlled trial data (HOPE4HF [Barostim Hope of Heart Failure Study], BEAT-HF [Better Effectiveness After Transition–Heart Failure]) demonstrating improvements in QoL, functional capacity, and N-terminal pro–B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level reduction in this patient population. BAT is primarily indicated for patients with HFrEF and NYHA class III symptoms despite optimal GDMT.
NYHA class II HF symptoms with mild limitation of physical activity is an incorrect answer choice because BAT is intended for patients with more significant functional impairment (NYHA class III HF), as they derive the most benefit from sympathetic modulation. Patients with NYHA class II HF symptoms typically have only mild limitations and can often be managed effectively with medication alone. Similarly, HFpEF and well-controlled BP is an incorrect answer choice because BAT has only been studied and approved for HFrEF (LVEF ≤35%). HFpEF is characterized by diastolic dysfunction rather than the neurohormonal dysregulation that BAT primarily addresses, and there is insufficient evidence to support its use in patients with HFpEF. LVEF <25% with recurrent HF hospitalizations and worsening end-organ function is also an incorrect answer choice because patients with these histories are typically in more advanced HF stages (NYHA class IV), making them better candidates for advanced therapies such as LV assist devices or heart transplant. BAT is intended for patients who remain symptomatic but stable, not those with frequent decompensations and worsening organ dysfunction.
BAT is an emerging treatment for patients with HFrEF who continue to experience symptoms despite optimal medical management.
Physiological Basis of BAT
Baroreflex dysfunction leads to autonomic dysregulation, including parasympathetic withdrawal and sympathetic overactivation, which contributes to HF progression. Afferent input originates from carotid sinus and aortic arch receptors, which regulate sympathetic and parasympathetic output through central nervous system pathways. BAT stimulates carotid baroreceptors via an implanted pulse generator, resulting in decreased sympathetic activity and increased parasympathetic outflow.
Clinical Evidence Supporting BAT
The HOPE4HF phase 2 trial data demonstrated that BAT improved NYHA functional class (55% vs. 24%), Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, and 6-min walk distance (6MWD), with a reduction in NT-proBNP levels and improvement in LVEF. The subsequent BEAT-HF phase 3 trial data confirmed improvements in QoL, functional capacity, and NT-proBNP levels, leading to FDA approval of the Barostim NEO System (CVRx Inc., Minneapolis, Minnesota) in 2019 to treat patients with NYHA class III HF (or NYHA class II HF with recent class III history), LVEF ≤35%, and NT-proBNP level <1600 pg/mL who are not candidates for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). In 2024, the BEAT-HF trial evaluated BAT in patients with HFrEF. The study reported a win ratio of 1.26 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.58), favoring the BAT group, indicating 26% more favorable outcomes than in the control group. However, the primary composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and HF morbidity did not show a statistically significant difference between the BAT and control groups.
Persistent NYHA Class III HF Symptoms Despite Comprehensive GDMT
Patients with NYHA class III HF symptoms, such as this patient, experience significant limitations in physical activity despite taking optimized GDMT. BAT offers an innovative option to improve functional capacity and QoL for these patients. The results of the BEAT-HF trial and other studies have shown that BAT significantly reduces NT-proBNP levels and improves NYHA functional class in patients whose symptoms persist despite optimal medical therapy (OMT).
Patients Not Qualifying for CRT
CRT is recommended for patients with HF and a wide QRS complex (≥150 msec), particularly those with left bundle branch block (LBBB). BAT is a viable alternative for patients who do not meet these criteria, such as those with a normal QRSd, non-LBBB conduction patterns, or residual symptoms despite CRT with defibrillator.
Symptomatic Improvement
BAT has been shown to provide symptomatic relief in stable patients, with improvement in QoL, 6MWD, and NYHA functional class.
Potential for Stabilization in Early Advanced HF
Patients with HFrEF who have not yet progressed to NYHA class IV HF but continue to experience significant symptoms despite OMT may benefit from BAT, especially if their clinical status is stable.
Device Safety
BAT devices have demonstrated a favorable safety profile comparable to that of pacemaker-like devices. The minimally invasive implantation procedure is associated with low complication rates, and long-term use has been shown to be safe in HF populations.
Educational grant support provided by: CVRx, Inc.
To visit the Online Course page for the Baroreflex Activation Therapy (BAT): Optimizing Treatment of HF Grant, click here!
References
- Kaufmann H, Norcliffe-Kaufmann L, Palma JA. Baroreflex dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(2):163-178. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1509723
- Ferguson DW, Abboud FM, Mark AL. Selective impairment of baroreflex-mediated vasoconstrictor responses in patients with ventricular dysfunction. Circulation. 1984;69(3):451-460. doi:10.1161/01.cir.69.3.451
- Gronda E, Francis D, Zannad F, Hamm C, Brugada J, Vanoli E. Baroreflex activation therapy: a new approach to the management of advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2017;18(9):641-649. doi:10.2459/JCM.0000000000000544
- Georgakopoulos D, Little WC, Abraham WT, Weaver FA, Zile MR. Chronic baroreflex activation: a potential therapeutic approach to heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Card Fail. 2011;17(2):167-178. doi:10.1016/j.cardfail.2010.09.004
- Abraham WT, Zile MR, Weaver FA, et al. Baroreflex activation therapy for the treatment of heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction. JACC Heart Fail. 2015;3(6):487-496. doi:10.1016/j.jchf.2015.02.006
- Zile MR, Lindenfeld J, Weaver FA, et al. Baroreflex activation therapy in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(1):1-13. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.015
- Zile MR, Lindenfeld J, Weaver FA, et al. Baroreflex activation therapy in patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction: long-term outcomes. Eur J Heart Fail. 2024;26(4):1051-1061. doi:10.1002/ejhf.3232