Coronary CTA vs. Direct Invasive Angiography
Study Questions:
What is the safety and outcome of a strategy using coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) as an initial test in patients with stable symptoms referred for invasive coronary angiography (ICA)?
Methods:
The CONSERVE (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Selective Cardiac Catheterization) trial evaluated patients from 22 sites with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD) referred for elective ICA, and randomized patients to a plan of direct ICA versus initial CCTA followed by ICA at the provider’s discretion. The primary endpoint was that initial CCTA was noninferior to direct ICA for adverse events (death, myocardial infarction, unstable angina, stroke, urgent coronary revascularization, or cardiac hospitalization).
Results:
This study randomized 823 patients to an initial CCTA strategy and 808 patients to a direct ICA strategy. There were no differences in adverse events for initial CCTA versus direct ICA at a median follow-up of 1 year (4.6% vs. 4.6%, hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.47; p = 0.03 for noninferiority). In patients with initial CCTA, only 23% of individuals underwent ICA. An initial CCTA versus direct ICA strategy resulted in lower rates of coronary revascularization (13% vs. 18%, p < 0.001). The absence of obstructive CAD was observed in 25% with initial CCTA versus 61% with direct ICA (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
In patients with suspected CAD referred for ICA, an initial CCTA strategy was associated with similar rates of adverse events as direct ICA, lower ICA utilization, and lower rates of coronary revascularization.
Perspective:
Studies have clearly demonstrated that a majority of patients undergoing ICA do not have obstructive CAD, which has prompted calls for better strategies to avoid unnecessary ICA in patients with suspected CAD and stable symptoms. This large multicenter study finds that patients referred for elective ICA who instead were randomized to initial CCTA had low rates of ICA utilization following CCTA, lower rates of revascularization, and similar rates of adverse events at 1 year. One advantage of this study is that the CCTA arm utilized a real-world approach, with providers deciding whether or not to proceed with subsequent ICA based on their clinical judgment and using the CCTA findings as a “gatekeeper” prior to ICA. These findings suggest that considering CCTA prior to elective ICA could reduce unnecessary procedures and result in similar outcomes, and should be considered in clinical practice and future guidelines.
Clinical Topics: Cardiac Surgery, Cardiovascular Care Team, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Noninvasive Imaging, Atherosclerotic Disease (CAD/PAD), Interventions and Coronary Artery Disease, Interventions and Imaging, Angiography, Computed Tomography, Nuclear Imaging
Keywords: Angina, Unstable, Angiography, Cardiac Catheterization, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease, Diagnostic Imaging, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Ischemia, Myocardial Revascularization, Stroke, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
< Back to Listings