Previous MINOCA: Coronary Findings and Prognosis

Study Questions:

Among patients with a history of myocardial infarction (MI) with nonobstructive coronary arteries (MINOCAs) who are subsequently readmitted with recurrent MI, what are: 1) the mechanisms for reinfarction, and 2) the prognosis?

Methods:

This Swedish observational study of patients hospitalized with MINOCA utilized the SWEDEHEART registry from 2003-2013. The study group included patients with an admission for MI with a diagnosis of MINOCA (n = 9,092) and a subsequent hospitalization for a recurrent MI (n = 570).

Results:

Of 570 patients with MINOCA and recurrent MI, the mean age was 69.1 years, 59.1% were women, and median time to readmission was 17 months. Of 340 patients who underwent a new coronary angiography, 180 (53%) had recurrent MINOCA and 160 (47%) had obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) (one-vessel CAD in 123, two-vessel in 26, three-vessel in nine patients). Obstructive CAD was more common in men and patients with diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, higher creatinine, and ST elevation at presentation. Mortality was similar whether the reinfarction was MINOCA or MI with obstructive CAD (13.9% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.54; median follow-up, 38 months).

Conclusions:

Among patients with MINOCA readmitted with reinfarction who underwent coronary angiography, nearly half had progression of coronary stenosis. Mortality was similar between those with and without obstructive CAD.

Perspective:

This study showed that 6% of patients with MINOCA developed a new MI during mean follow-up of 4.3 years. Of these, 60% underwent cardiac catheterization and nearly half had obstructive coronary disease. The authors concluded that progression of obstructive CAD is common and that repeat angiogram is warranted. Since this is an observational study, the clinical decision to send a patient for cardiac catheterization rather than to continue with medical management would have influenced the findings. The patients with recurrent MI were older, had more diabetes and hypertension, and had lower ejection fraction. The study design prevented differentiation between those with normal coronary arteries (0% stenosis) and mild CAD (1-50% stenosis), but this would be an important distinction in future studies because MINOCA can result from various etiologies. Further differentiation would be helpful for determining long-term prognosis and medical therapy. Thus, in the appropriate clinical setting, it may be important and beneficial to consider coronary angiography in patients presenting with recurrent MI after a prior diagnosis of MINOCA.

Clinical Topics: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Cardiovascular Care Team, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Noninvasive Imaging, Prevention, Vascular Medicine, Atherosclerotic Disease (CAD/PAD), Interventions and ACS, Interventions and Coronary Artery Disease, Interventions and Imaging, Interventions and Vascular Medicine, Angiography, Nuclear Imaging, Hypertension

Keywords: Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiac Catheterization, Constriction, Pathologic, Coronary Angiography, Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Stenosis, Creatinine, Diabetes Mellitus, Hypertension, Myocardial Infarction, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Stroke Volume, Vascular Diseases


< Back to Listings