Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization Strategies to Treat Multivessel Disease After Early PCI for STEMI - COMPLETE
Contribution To Literature:
The COMPLETE trial showed that complete revascularization was superior to culprit-only revascularization at reducing death or MI.
The goal of the trial was to evaluate a complete revascularization strategy compared with a culprit-only revascularization strategy among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease.
Patients with STEMI and multivessel coronary disease were randomized to complete revascularization (n = 2,016) versus culprit-only revascularization (n = 2,025). Patients randomized to complete revascularization underwent staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the index hospitalization or after hospital discharge (within 45 days).
- Total number of enrollees: 4,041
- Duration of follow-up: 3 years
- Mean patient age: 62 years
- Percentage female: 19%
- Percentage with diabetes: 19%
- Patient with STEMI undergoing primary PCI
- Nonculprit multivessel coronary disease, defined as a 70% stenosis or 50-69% stenosis with fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.8
- Intention to revascularize a nonculprit lesion before randomization
- Planned surgical revascularization
- Previous coronary artery bypass grafting
Other salient features/characteristics:
- Thrombus aspiration performed in 24%
The primary outcome of cardiovascular death or MI at 3 years occurred in 7.8% of the complete revascularization group compared with 10.5% of the culprit-only revascularization group (p = 0.004). This outcome was the same if PCI was performed during or after the index hospitalization (p for interaction = 0.62).
- Cardiovascular death, MI, or ischemia-driven revascularization: 8.9% with complete revascularization vs. 16.7% with culprit-only revascularization (p < 0.001)
- Major bleeding: 2.9% with complete revascularization vs. 2.2% with culprit-only revascularization (p = 0.15)
- Contrast-induced nephropathy: 1.5% with complete revascularization vs. 0.9% with culprit-only revascularization (p = 0.11)
Among patients with STEMI and multivessel disease undergoing primary PCI, complete revascularization was superior to culprit-only revascularization. Complete revascularization was associated with a reduction in cardiovascular death or MI. This was accomplished without an increase in major bleeding or contrast-induced nephropathy.
Previous trials on the topic have demonstrated benefit for complete revascularization, but benefit was mainly due to a reduction in the risk of revascularization. The COMPLETE trial was able to show that complete revascularization was associated with a reduction in ‘hard outcomes’ since the primary outcome was cardiovascular death or MI.
In summary, complete revascularization (before or after the index hospitalization) after primary PCI for STEMI is beneficial.
Mehta SR, Wood DA, Storey RF, et al., on behalf of the COMPLETE Trial Steering Committee and Investigators. Complete Revascularization With Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction. N Engl J Med 2019;Sept 1:[Epub ahead of print].
Editorial: Køber L, Engstrøm T. A More COMPLETE Picture of Revascularization in STEMI. N Engl J Med 2019;Sept 1:[Epub ahead of print].
Presented by Dr. Shamir R. Mehta at the European Society of Cardiology Congress, Paris, France, September 1, 2019.
Clinical Topics: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Cardiac Surgery, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Atherosclerotic Disease (CAD/PAD), Aortic Surgery, Interventions and ACS, Interventions and Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords: ESC Congress, ESC 19, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Constriction, Pathologic, Coronary Artery Bypass, Coronary Artery Disease, Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial, Hemorrhage, Hospitalization, Myocardial Infarction, Myocardial Revascularization, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Thrombosis
< Back to Listings