Bleeding in AF Patients With Diltiazem and DOAC Therapy

Quick Takes

  • Diltiazem and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban) are commonly co-prescribed for patients with AF.
  • Concurrent use of diltiazem with a DOAC was associated with a higher rate of significant bleeding than use of metoprolol-DOAC combination.
  • Clinicians need to assess for important drug-drug interactions with DOAC medications, potentially considering alternative rate-controlling agents in AF.

Study Questions:

What are the risks of serious bleeding with new users of apixaban or rivaroxaban for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) who are also treated with diltiazem or metoprolol?

Methods:

The authors conducted a retrospective study of Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with AF who newly initiate on apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy and also began using diltiazem or metoprolol. They included patients between 2012 and 2020 and followed patients for 365 days. The primary outcome was a composite of bleeding-related hospitalization and death with a recent bleeding event. Secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, major ischemic or hemorrhagic events, and death without recent bleeding. Cox proportional hazards models and propensity score models were used to adjust for covariates and baseline differences between the diltiazem and metoprolol groups.

Results:

The study includes 204,155 US Medicare beneficiaries receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) for stroke prevention in AF, of whom 53,275 received diltiazem and 150,880 received metoprolol. Patients receiving diltiazem treatment had an increased risk for the primary outcome (bleeding-related hospitalization or death with a recent bleeding event) as compared to patients receiving metoprolol (rate difference, 10.6/1,000-patient-years; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-14.2; hazard ratio [HR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.13-1.29). Patients treated with diltiazem also had higher rates of bleeding-related hospitalization (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.13-1.31) and death with recent bleeding (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.34) as compared to patients receiving metoprolol. The risk of the primary outcome was greater for patients receiving a higher dose of diltiazem (>120 mg/day) than for those receiving lower doses (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.14-1.24). Neither group had a significant change in the risk of ischemic stroke or systemic embolism or for death without recent bleeding.

Conclusions:

The authors conclude that among patients with AF receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban therapy, concurrent use of diltiazem was associated with a greater risk of serious bleeding than concurrent use of metoprolol.

Perspective:

Use of DOACs, including apixaban and rivaroxaban, has been an important advance in the prevention of stroke for patients with AF. This includes both easier to use regimens and less severe bleeding (e.g., intracranial hemorrhage) as compared to vitamin K antagonist therapy. However, while these medications are easy to prescribe and utilize, important drug-drug interactions are often overlooked. This includes the use of medications that inhibit CYP3A4 hepatic metabolism, such as diltiazem, apixaban, and rivaroxaban. As such, concurrent use of these medications can lead to an increased overall anticoagulant effect from these fixed-dose regimens.

This large, observational study provides the strongest evidence to date that co-administration of a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, such as diltiazem, can lead to clinically relevant adverse events with DOAC co-administration. This includes a dose-response association, where the risk of serious bleeding was highest for patients receiving >120 mg/day of diltiazem. Importantly, the study did not find an increased risk of thrombotic events. Also importantly, this study did not assess the role of DOAC dose-reduction with co-administration of diltiazem, and this strategy cannot be recommended without further evidence ensuing efficacy and safety. In the meantime, clinicians should be aware of this clinically relevant drug-drug interaction and engage patients in a shared decision-making discussion about the use of various rate-controlling agents when they are managing AF. Additionally, this is an important opportunity for anticoagulation stewardship systems (e.g., pharmacist use of population health dashboards, clinical decision support alerts) to identify these at-risk patients and ensure that the safest therapies have been discussed with patients.

Clinical Topics: Anticoagulation Management, Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Anticoagulation Management and Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias

Keywords: Anticoagulants, Atrial Fibrillation


< Back to Listings