Study Shows Epinephrine May Do More Harm Than Good in Cardiac Arrest
For patients in cardiac arrest, administering epinephrine helps to restart the heart but may increase the overall likelihood of death or debilitating brain damage, according to a study published Dec. 1 the Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
The study, led by Florence Dumas, MD, PhD, of the Parisian Cardiovascular Research Center in France, sought to offer new data in an ongoing debate over the risks and benefits of using epinephrine to treat cardiac arrest, and analyzed hospital records for more than 1,500 people admitted to a large Parisian hospital over a 12-year period. Patients included in the analysis had suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, been resuscitated and achieved return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Nearly three-quarters of the patients had received at least one dose of epinephrine.
The primary outcome measured was discharge from the hospital with normal or only moderately compromised brain functioning. Results showed 63 percent of patients who did not receive epinephrine achieved this outcome, compared to only 19 percent of those who received epinephrine.
Further, patients receiving higher doses of epinephrine fared worse than those with lower doses. As compared to patients who received no epinephrine, those receiving 1-milligram doses were 52 percent more likely to have a bad outcome and those receiving 5-milligram or larger doses were 77 percent more likely to have a bad outcome.
Timing also appears to be an important factor. Patients receiving epinephrine in the later stages of resuscitation were more likely to die than those who got their first epinephrine dose shortly after collapsing. The adverse effects of epinephrine appeared to be unaffected by the use of post-resuscitation medical treatments, such as techniques to cool the body to reduce tissue damage or interventions to restore the flow of blood through blocked arteries.
Dumas notes that this study underscores the need for caution when using epinephrine. Administering epinephrine to patients in cardiac arrest has been shown to improve ROSC, but the new study adds to mounting evidence suggesting the drug harms patients’ chances of surviving past the post-resuscitation period with brain function intact.
As current international guidelines recommend administering 1 milligram of epinephrine every three to five minutes during resuscitation, Dumas adds that the results do not necessarily indicate an immediate need to change the guidelines, however. “It’s very difficult, because epinephrine at a low dose seems to have a good impact in the first few minutes, but appears more harmful if used later,” said Dumas. “It would be dangerous to completely incriminate this drug, because it may well be helpful for certain patients under certain circumstances. This is one more study that points strongly to the need to study epinephrine further in animals and in randomized trials.”
In addition to further research on epinephrine, Dumas said the study reinforces the need to continue investigating other drugs and drug combinations that might offer safer alternatives to epinephrine during cardiac arrest.
A related editorial comment by Gordon A. Ewy, MD, FACC, notes, “further research, first in animal models and later in humans, can continue to assess whether a pure alpha agent or combination of agents may be superior to epinephrine during the circulatory phase of resuscitation.”
< Back to Listings