Reduction in Inappropriate Therapy and Mortality Through ICD Programming

Study Questions:

Does avoidance of inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies improve survival?

Methods:

In the MADIT-RIT trial, 1,500 patients (mean age 63 years) who received an ICD for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) were randomly assigned to either: 1) conventional programming: a detection zone of 170-199 bpm with a 2.5-second delay and atrial discriminators turned on, and a second zone at ≥200 bpm with a 1-second delay before delivery of the ICD therapy (n = 514); 2) high-rate group: therapy zone of ≥200 bpm, with a 2.5-second monitoring delay (n = 500); or 3) delayed-therapy group: a zone of 170-199 bpm with rhythm detection on and a 60-second therapy delay, a zone at ≥200 bpm with rhythm detection on and a 12-second therapy delay, and a third zone at ≥250 bpm with a 2.5-second therapy delay (n = 486). The patients were seen in a device clinic every 3-6 months. The primary endpoint was the first inappropriate ICD therapy.

Results:

A first inappropriate ICD therapy was significantly less prevalent in the high-rate (4%) and delayed-therapy (6%) groups than in the conventional group (21%). Compared to the conventional group, mortality at 2.5 years was significantly lower in the high-rate group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45), and tended to be lower in the delayed-therapy group (HR, 0.56). Appropriate ICD therapies also were significantly less prevalent in the high-rate (13%) and delayed-therapy (8%) groups than in the conventional group (27%).

Conclusions:

Programming strategies that minimize inappropriate ICD therapies are associated with improved survival in patients receiving an ICD for primary prevention of SCD.

Perspective:

Because of the impact on patient survival, the results of this important study should be incorporated into clinical practice as soon as possible.

Keywords: Defibrillators, Implantable, Primary Prevention


< Back to Listings