Sex Differences in HFrEF

Study Questions:

How have sex differences in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) evolved in recent trials?

Methods:

The study analyzed 12,058 men and 3,357 women enrolled in two large HFrEF trials, PARADIGM-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI [Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor] with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) and ATMOSPHERE (Aliskiren Trial to Minimize Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure). These trials had almost identical inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients were included in these trials if they were >18 years of age, had New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II-IV, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%, elevated natriuretic peptide level, and were taking an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker (ARB), beta-blocker (unless contraindicated or not tolerated), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), if indicated. Primary outcomes (composite of first HF hospitalization or CV death in both trials), its components, sudden death, pump failure death, non-CV death, and all-cause death were compared in women and men.

Results:

Women comprised 21.8% of the cohort and tended to be older than men; 36.7% of women were >70 years compared to 28.1% of men. Aside from hypertension (70.6% women vs. 65.5% men) and clinically significant valvular disease (5.3% vs. 4.6%), women were less likely to have a history of major CV comorbid conditions such as atrial fibrillation (32.6% vs. 36.4%), previous myocardial infarction (30.0% vs. 45.4%), and stroke (7.4% vs 8.0%). Women had a lower prevalence of coronary artery disease (43% vs. 56%), reported moderate to extreme depression or anxiety more often than men (44% vs. 29%), had been hospitalized for HF less often than men (58.1% vs. 62.3%), and were less likely to have an ischemic etiology (50.0% vs. 60.5%). Women reported mores signs/symptoms of HF than men and had significantly worse quality of life (QOL) (lower Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores) and greater functional impairment than men. Baseline use of beta-blockers, diuretics, and MRAs was similar between men and women, while women had greater use of digitalis and ARBs and less use of ACE inhibitors. Anticoagulation was used less often in women, and women were less likely to have received a device than men: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (8.6% vs. 16.6%) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (4.1% vs. 6.9%). Women were also less likely to be referred to a disease management program or to be prescribed exercise. Women had significantly lower mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.74; p < 0.001) and lower risk of HF hospitalization (HR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.72-0.89; p < 0.001), but higher rates of stroke.

Conclusions:

Despite better survival and lower rates of hospitalization than men, women with HFrEF have more HF signs/symptoms, poorer health-related QOL, and greater functional and psychological impairment than men. In addition, some HF therapies continue to be underutilized in women.

Perspective:

Women with HFrEF tend to have more symptom burden and greater physical and psychological disability than men. Future studies should target these differences in evaluating strategies to improve the care of women with HFrEF.

Keywords: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, Coronary Artery Disease, Death, Sudden, Defibrillators, Implantable, Depression, Diuretics, Geriatrics, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Myocardial Infarction, Natriuretic Peptides, Quality of Life, Sex Characteristics, Stroke, Stroke Volume


< Back to Listings