Outcomes With Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Interventions

Study Questions:

What is the mid-term valve-related outcome with transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) in patients with prior surgical tricuspid valve (TV) repair or replacement?

Methods:

Data were collected through the international real-world observational VIVID Registry, for patients who underwent TTVR after prior surgical TV repair (valve-in-ring) or replacement (valve-in-valve). The primary outcomes evaluated for this study were TV function, reintervention (surgical or transcatheter) on the TV, and endocarditis or valve thrombus after TTVR. Indications for reintervention were at the discretion of treating physicians and were not standardized. Diagnosis of endocarditis was also determined by the treating physicians. Valve function and valve thrombosis were also reported. A composite valve-related adverse outcome metric was also defined as reintervention, endocarditis, thrombus, or significant tricuspid stenosis or tricuspid regurgitation (TR).

Results:

From 2008 through 2017, 306 patients from 80 centers underwent TTVR after prior surgical TV replacement (valve-in-valve, n = 284; 93%) or repair (valve-in-ring, n = 22) and were included in this analysis. Fifty-two of these patients (17%) had a prior history of endocarditis, which was the underlying cause of TV dysfunction that ultimately led to surgical replacement or repair. TTVR was performed with a Melody valve in 138 patients (45%) or a Sapien valve in 168 (55%).

In seven patients the implanted valve malpositioned or embolized; four of these patients had a second valve implanted during the same catheterization resulting in elimination of paravalvular regurgitation, two had the valve repositioned to the right atrium or inferior vena cava and underwent surgery emergently (n = 1) or several months later (n = 1), and one with a stable valve but paravalvular leakage underwent surgical TVR later during the same hospitalization.

After TTVR, the mean TV inflow gradient and TR grade measured by echocardiography improved significantly. There was no difference in the early post-intervention gradient according to indication for TTVR, transcatheter valve type, underlying congenital versus acquired TV disease, or prior endocarditis history. Patients with a surgical TV prosthesis size 29 mm or larger had a lower post-TTVR gradient than those with smaller valves (3.6 ± 1.8 mm Hg vs. 4.2 ± 2.3 mm Hg; p = 0.02).

Patients were followed for a median of 15.9 months after implantation. During that time, 36 patients died, eight within 30 days (2.6%). Death was related to procedural complications in two patients, cardiovascular causes unrelated to the procedure in 20, and noncardiovascular causes in 14. Older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.03 per year) and patient acutely ill and hospitalized before TTVR (HR, 4.4) independently predicted death over time. Prior history of endocarditis and other baseline or procedural factors were not associated with shorter survival and there was no difference in valve-related outcomes according to TTVR valve type.

Thirty-one patients (10%) underwent reintervention on the TV during follow-up: surgical TVR in 18 patients, a second TTVR within the first for malposition or dysfunction in eight patients, re-dilation of the original TTVR in three patients, and device closure of paravalvar leak in two patients. The cumulative incidence of reintervention was 5% at 1 year, 12% at 3 years, and 19% at 5 years. Higher early post-TTVR inflow gradient was associated with shorter freedom from reintervention. Annualized incidence of endocarditis was 1.5% per patient-year.

Eight patients were diagnosed with clinically relevant valve thrombosis (n = 4) or presumed thrombus (immobility or thickening of the leaflets; n = 4), three within several days of TTVR, two within 2 months (early), and three beyond 6 months (late). Higher immediate post-TTVR inflow gradient was associated with increased risk of thrombosis (HR, 1.38 per mm Hg).

Conclusions:

TV dysfunction, endocarditis, and leaflet thrombosis are uncommon after TTVR. Patients with prior endocarditis were not at higher risk for endocarditis or other adverse outcomes after TTVR. TTVR is associated with excellent mid-term valve-related outcomes regardless of valve choice (Melody or Sapien).

Perspective:

While we await trials investigating dedicated TTVR devices, this report shows early promise with existing aortic (Sapien) and pulmonary (Melody) transcatheter valvular technologies in the tricuspid position. Future research will help delineate the role for TTVR in such patients. How these therapies will interact with upcoming transcatheter tricuspid valve repair techniques also needs to be defined.

Keywords: Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Catheterization, Constriction, Pathologic, Dilatation, Echocardiography, Embolism, Endocarditis, Heart Failure, Heart Valve Diseases, Heart Valve Prosthesis, Prostheses and Implants, Prosthesis Implantation, Thrombosis, Tricuspid Valve Insufficiency, Tricuspid Valve Stenosis, Vena Cava, Inferior


< Back to Listings