BASHORE
ET AL., ACC/SCA&I CLINICAL EXPERT CONSENSUS DOCUMENT
ON CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY STANDARDS
JACC VOL. 37, NO. 8, JUNE 2001:2170-214
American
College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography
and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document
on Cardiac Catheterization
Laboratory Standards
A
Report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force
on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents
References
1.
Sheldon WC. Trends in cardiac catheterization laboratories
in the United States. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2001.
(In Press).
2.
Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Ellis SG, Faxon DP. Recommendations
for the assessment and maintenance of proficiency in
coronary interventional procedures: Statement of the
American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1998;31:722-743.
3.
Smith SC, Jr, Jacobs AK, Kennedy JW, et al. ACC/AHA
Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Revision
of the 1993 PTCA Guidelines). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001.
(In Press).
4.
Canto JG, Every NR, Magid DJ, et al. The volume of primary
angioplasty procedures and survival after acute myocardial
infarction. National Registry of Myocardial Infarction
2 Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:1573-1580.
5.
Pepine CJ, Allen HD, Bashore TM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines
for cardiac catheterization and cardiac catheterization
laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization.
Circulation. 1991;84:2213-2247.
6.
Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Directory
of Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories in the United
States. 4th ed. Bethesda, Md.: 1996.
7.
Brush JE, Jr, Thompson S, Ciuffo AA, et al. Retrospective
Comparison of a Strategy of Primary Coronary Angioplasty
versus Intravenous Thrombolytic Therapy for Acute Myocardial
Infarction in a Community Hospital without Cardiac Surgical
Backup. J Invasive Cardiol. 1996;8:91-98.
8.
Smyth DW, Richards AM, Elliott JM. Direct Angioplasty
for Myocardial Infarction: One-Year Experience in a
Center with Surgical Back-up 220 Miles Away. J Invasive
Cardiol. 1997;9:324-332.
9.
Wharton TPJ, McNamara NS, Fedele FA, Jacobs MI, Gladstone
AR, Funk EJ. Primary angioplasty for the treatment of
acute myocardial infarction: experience at two community
hospitals without cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1999;33:1257-1265.
10.
Antman EM, Giugliano RP, Gibson CM, et al. Abciximab
facilitates the rate and extent of thrombolysis: results
of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI)
14 trial. The TIMI 14 Investigators. Circulation.
1999;99:2720-2732.
11.
Lange RA, Hillis LD. Should thrombolysis or primary
angioplasty be the treatment of choice for acute myocardial
infarction? Thrombolysis--the preferred treatment.
N Engl J Med. 1996;335:1311-1312.
12.
Klinke WP, Hui W. Percutaneous transluminal coronary
angioplasty without on-site surgical facilities.
Am J Cardiol. 1992;70:1520-1525.
13.
Richardson SG, Morton P, Murtagh JG, O'Keeffe DB, Murphy
P, Scott ME. Management of acute coronary occlusion
during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty:
experience of complications in a hospital without on
site facilities for cardiac surgery. BMJ. 1990;300:355-358.
14.
Bernstein SJ, et al. Coronary Angiography: A Literature
Review and Ratings of Appropriateness and Necessity.
Santa Monica, Calif: RAND; 1992.
15.
Kemp HG, Kronmal RA, Vlietstra RE, Frye RL. Seven year
survival of patients with normal or near normal coronary
arteriograms: a CASS registry study. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1986;7:479-483.
16.
Johnson LW, Lozner EC, Johnson S, et al. Coronary arteriography
1984-1987: a report of the Registry of the Society for
Cardiac Angiography and Interventions, I. results and
complications. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1989;17:5-10.
17.
Johnson LW, Krone R. Cardiac catheterization 1991: a
report of the Registry of the Society for Cardiac Angiography
and Interventions (SCA&I). Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1993;28:219-220.
18.
Scanlon PJ, Faxon DP, Audet AM, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines
for coronary angiography: a report of the American College
of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force
on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography).
Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac
Angiography and Interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1999;33:1756-1824.
19.
Laskey W, Boyle J, Johnson LW. Multivariable model for
prediction of risk of significant complication during
diagnostic cardiac catheterization. The Registry Committee
of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;30:185-190.
20.
Folland ED, Oprian C, Giacomini J, et al. Complications
of cardiac catheterization and angiography in patients
with valvular heart disease. VA Cooperative Study on
Valvular Heart Disease. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1989;17:15-21.
21.
Roelke M, Smith AJ, Palacios IF. The technique and safety
of transseptal left heart catheterization: the Massachusetts
General Hospital experience with 1,279 procedures. Cathet
Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;32:332-339.
22.
Baraldi-Junkins C, Levin HR, Kasper EK, Rayburn BK,
Herskowitz A, Baughman KL. Complications of endomyocardial
biopsy in heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung
Transplant. 1993;12:63-67.
23.
Williams DO, Holubkov R, Yeh W, et al. Percutaneous
coronary intervention in the current era compared with
1985-1986: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Registries. Circulation 2000;102:2945-2951.
24.
Laskey WK, Kimmel S, Krone RJ. Contemporary trends in
coronary intervention: a report from the Registry of
the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49:19-22.
25.
The Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigators
(BARI). Comparison of coronary bypass surgery with angioplasty
in patients with multivessel disease. N Engl J Med.
1996;318:265-270.
26.
Hannan EL, Racz M, Ryan TJ, et al. Coronary angioplasty
volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologists.
JAMA. 1997;277:892-898.
27.
Ellis SG, Omoigui N, Bittl JA, et al. Analysis and comparison
of operator-specific outcomes in interventional cardiology:
from a multicenter database of 4860 quality-controlled
procedures. Circulation. 1996;93:431-439.
28.
Jollis JG, Peterson ED, Nelson CL, et al. Relationship
between physician and hospital coronary angioplasty
volume and outcome in elderly patients. Circulation.
1997;95:2485-2491.
29.
Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blockade and
low-dose heparin during percutaneous coronary revascularization.
The EPILOG Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1997;336:1689-1696.
30.
Randomised placebo-controlled and balloon-angioplasty-controlled
trial to assess safety of coronary stenting with use
of platelet glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa blockade. The EPISTENT
Investigators. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor
for Stenting. Lancet. 1998;352:87-92.
31.
Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JE, et al. Randomized,
placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa
blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial
infarction. ReoPro and Primary PTCA Organization and
Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators. Circulation.
1998;98:734-741.
32.
Grines CL, Browne KF, Marco J, et al. A comparison of
immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for
acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty
in Myocardial Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med.
1993;328:673-679.
33.
Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty
with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial
infarction. Stent Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial
Infarction Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1999;341:1949-1956.
34.
A clinical trial comparing primary coronary angioplasty
with tissue plasminogen activator for acute myocardial
infarction. The Global Use of Strategies to Open Occluded
Coronary Arteries in Acute Coronary Syndromes (GUSTO
IIb) Angioplasty Substudy Investigators [published erratum
appears in N Engl J Med 1997 24;337:287]. N Engl
J Med. 1997;336:1621-1628.
35.
Block PC, Peterson EC, Krone R, et al. Identification
of variables needed to risk adjust outcomes of coronary
interventions: evidence-based guidelines for efficient
data collection. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:275-282.
36.
Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Strom BL, Laskey WK. Development
and validation of simplified predictive index for major
complications in contemporary percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty practice. The Registry Committee
of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;26:931-938.
37.
Ellis SG. Coronary lesions at increased risk. Am
Heart J. 1995;130:643-646.
38.
Baim DS, Detre K, Kent K. Problems in the development
of new devices for coronary intervention: possible role
for a multicenter registry. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1989;14:1389-1392.
39.
Dean LS, George CJ, Roubin GS, et al. Bailout and corrective
use of Gianturco-Roubin flex stents after percutaneous
transluminal coronary angioplasty: operator reports
and angiographic core laboratory verification from the
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute/New Approaches
to Coronary Intervention Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1997;29:934-940.
40.
Lindsay J, Pinnow EE, Pichard AD. Benchmarking operator
performance in percutaneous coronary intervention: a
novel approach using 30-day events. Catheter Cardiovasc
Interv. 2001;52:139-145.
41.
Wondrow MA, Laskey WK, Hildner FJ, Cusma J, Holmes DR.
Cardiac catheterization laboratory imaging quality assurance
program. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;52:59-66.
42.
Laskey WK, Holmes DR, Kern MJ. Image quality assessment:
a timely look [editorial]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv.
1999;46:125-126.
43.
Judkins MP. Guidelines for electrical safety in the
cardiac catheterization laboratory. Cathet Cardiovasc
Diagn. 1984;10:299-301.
44.
American College of Cardiology-National Cardiovascular
Data Registryª Version 2.0. 2001. American College of
Cardiology Web site. Available at: http://www.acc.org/ncdr/cathlab.htm.
Accessed April 4, 2001.
45.
Dehmer GJ, Arani D, Noto T, et al. Lessons learned from
the review of cardiac catheterization laboratories:
a report from the Laboratory Survey Committee of the
Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;46:24-31.
46.
Kimmel SE, Berlin JA, Laskey WK. The relationship between
coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications.
JAMA. 1995;274:1137-1142.
47.
Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists:
a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists
Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists.
Anesthesiology. 1996;84:459-471.
48.
Goldberg M. Systemic reactions to intravascular contrast
media: a guide for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology.
1984;60:46-56.
49.
Goss JE, Chambers CE, Heupler FA, Jr. Systemic anaphylactoid
reactions to iodinated contrast media during cardiac
catheterization procedures: guidelines for prevention,
diagnosis, and treatment. Laboratory Performance Standards
Committee of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and
Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1995;34:99-104.
50.
Greenberger PA, Patterson R. Adverse reactions to radiocontrast
media. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1988;31:239-248.
51.
Barrett BJ, Carlisle EJ. Metaanalysis of the relative
nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality iodinated
contrast media. Radiology. 1993;188:171-178.
52.
Hill JA. Nonionic contrast use in cardiac angiography.
Invest Radiol. 1993;28 (suppl 5):S48-S53.
53.
Lawrence V, Matthai W, Hartmaier S. Comparative safety
of high-osmolality and low-osmolality radiographic contrast
agents: report of a multidisciplinary working group.
Invest Radiol. 1992;27:2-28.
54.
Tepel M, van der Giet M, Schwarzfeld C, Laufer U, Liermann
D, Zidek W. Prevention of radiographic-contrast-agent-induced
reductions in renal function by acetylcysteine. N
Engl J Med. 7-1-0;343:180-184.
55.
Heupler FA, Jr. Guidelines for performing angiography
in patients taking metformin. Members of the Laboratory
Performance Standards Committee of the Society for Cardiac
Angiography and Interventions. Cathet Cardiovasc
Diagn. 1998;43:121-123.
56.
Kussmaul WG, III, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, et al. Rapid
arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications
after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results
of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:1685-1692.
57.
Stewart WJ, McSweeney SM, Kellett MA, Faxon DP, Ryan
TJ. Increased risk of severe protamine reactions in
NPH insulin-dependent diabetics undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Circulation. 1984;70:788-792.
58.
Leaman DM, Zelis RF. What is the appropriate "dress
code" for the cardiac catheterization laboratory? Cathet
Cardiovasc Diagn. 1983;9:33-38.
59.
Greene DG. Right heart catheterization and temporary
pacemaker insertion during coronary arteriography for
suspected coronary artery disease [editorial]. Cathet
Cardiovasc Diagn. 1984;10:429-430.
60.
Cohen BM, Weber VJ, Blum RR, et al. Cocktail attenuation
of rotational ablation flow effects (CARAFE) study:
pilot. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;Suppl 3:69-72.
61.
Nakagawa Y, Matsuo S, Kimura T, et al. Thrombectomy
with AngioJet catheter in native coronary arteries for
patients with acute or recent myocardial infarction.
Am J Cardiol. 1999;83:994-999.
62.
Joseph G, Baruah DK, Kuruttukulam SV, Chandy ST, Krishnaswami
S. Transjugular approach to transseptal balloon mitral
valvuloplasty. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;42:219-226.
63.
Stefanadis CI, Stratos CG, Lambrou SG, et al. Retrograde
nontransseptal balloon mitral valvuloplasty: immediate
results and intermediate long-term outcome in 441 cases-a
multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1009-1016.
64.
Glazier JJ, Turi ZG. Percutaneous balloon mitral valvuloplasty.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1997;40:5-26.
65.
Harrison JK, Wilson JS, Hearne SE, Bashore TM. Complications
related to percutaneous transvenous mitral commissurotomy.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994;Suppl 2:52-60:52-60.
66.
Carabello BA, Crawford FA, Jr. Valvular heart disease
[published erratum appears in N Engl J Med 1997;337:507].
N Engl J Med. 1997;337:32-41.
67.
Rubin LJ. Primary pulmonary hypertension. N Engl
J Med. 1997;336:111-117.
68.
Vetrovec GW, Goudreau E. Coronary Angiography for the
Interventionalist. New York, NY: Chapman & Hall; 1994.
129p.
69.
Society for Cardiac Angiography LPSC. Guidelines regarding
qualifications and responsibilities of a catheterization
laboratory director. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1983;9:619-621.
70.
Pepine CJ, Babb JD, Brinker JA, et al. Guidelines for
training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core Cardiology
Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 3: training
in cardiac catheterization and interventional cardiology.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:14-16.
71.
Alpert JS, Arnold WJ, Chaitman BR, et al. Guidelines
for training in adult cardiovascular medicine. Core
Cardiology Training Symposium (COCATS). Task Force 1:
training in clinical cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1995;25:4-9.
72.
Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Banas JS, Brundage BH, et al. Training
statement on recommendations for the structure of an
optimal adult interventional cardiology training program:
a report of the American College of Cardiology Task
Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents. J Am
Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:2141-2147.
73.
Ruiz CE, Mullins CE, Rochini AP, et al. Core curriculum
for the training of pediatric invasive/interventional
cardiologists: report of the Society for Cardiac Angiography
and Interventions Committee on Pediatric Cardiology
Training Standards. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1996;37:409-424.
74.
Jacobs AK, Faxon DP, Hirshfeld JW, Holmes DR, Jr. Task
Force 3: training in diagnostic cardiac catheterization
and interventional cardiology. Revision of the 1995
COCATS training statement. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002
(In Press).
75.
DeMots H, Coombs B, Murphy E, Palac R. Coronary arteriography
performed by a physician assistant. Am J Cardiol.
1987;60:784-787.
76.
Marshall D, Chambers C, Heupler FA, Jr. Performance
of adult catheterization: role of non-physicians as
independent operators. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1999;48:167-169.
77.
Ethics manual. Fourth edition. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 1998;128:576-594.
78.
Parmley WW, Passamani ER, Lo B. 29th Bethesda Conference.
Ethics in Cardiovascular Medicine (1997). Introduction.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:917-5.
79.
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part 1:
History; the patient; other physicians. American College
of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:245-252.
80.
American College of Physicians Ethics Manual. Part 2:
The physician and society; research; life-sustaining
treatment; other issues. American College of Physicians.
Ann Intern Med. 1989;111:327-335.
81.
21st Bethesda Conference: Ethics in cardiovascular medicine.
October 5-6, 1989, Bethesda, Maryland. J Am Coll
Cardiol. 1990;16:1-36.
82.
ACC/AHA guidelines for cardiac catheterization and cardiac
catheterization laboratories. American College of Cardiology/American
Heart Association Ad Hoc Task Force on Cardiac Catheterization.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1991;18:1149-1182.
83.
Blunt J, Savulescu J, Watson AJ. Meeting the challenges
facing research ethics committees: some practical suggestions.
BMJ. 1998;316:58-61.
84.
Relman AS. Dealing with conflicts of interest [editorial].
N Engl J Med. 1985;313:749-751.
85.
Stark FH. Physicians' conflicts in patient referrals
[comment]. JAMA. 1989;262:397.
86.
Todd JS, Horan JK. Physician referral: the AMA view.
JAMA. 1989;262:395-396.
87.
Hyman DA, Williamson JV. Fraud and abuse: setting the
limits on physicians' entrepreneurship. N Engl J
Med. 1989;320:1275-1278.
88.
Dyer AR. Professional organization of physicians: balancing
the cost-quality equation: an introduction. Theor
Med. 1989;10:185-193.
89.
Winters WL, Jr, McIntosh HD, Cheitlin MD, et al. Ethics
in cardiovascular medicine, Task Force II: The relation
of cardiovascular specialists to patients, other physicians
and physician-owned organizations. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1990;16:11-16.
90.
Conflicts of interest: physician ownership of medical
facilities. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs,
American Medical Association. JAMA. 1992;267:2366-2369.
91.
Heupler FAJ, Chambers CE, Dear WE, Angello DA, Heisler
M. Guidelines for internal peer review in the cardiac
catheterization laboratory. Laboratory Performance Standards
Committee, Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;40:21-32.
92.
Shimm DS, Spece RGJ. Industry reimbursement for entering
patients into clinical trials: legal and ethical issues.
Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:148-151.
93.
Limacher MC, Douglas PS, Germano G, et al. ACC expert
consensus document: radiation safety in the practice
of cardiology. American College of Cardiology. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;31:892-913.
94.
Holmes DR, Jr, Wondrow MA, Gray JE. Isn't it time to
abandon cine film? Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990;20:1-4.
95.
Fernandez-Bayo J, Barbero O, Rubies C, Sentis M, Donoso
L. Distributing medical images with internet technologies:
a DICOM web server and a DICOM java viewer. Radiographics.
2000;20:581-590.
96.
Holmes DR, Jr, Wondrow MA, Bell MR, Nissen SE, Cusma
JT. Cine film replacement: digital archival requirements
and remaining obstacles. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn.
1998;44:346-356.
97.
Balter S. Cine PACS: preprint. Catheter Cardiovasc
Interv. 1999;47:85-90.
98.
Holmes DR, Jr, Wondrow MA, Gray JE, Vetter RJ, Fellows
JL, Julsrud PR. Effect of pulsed progressive fluoroscopy
on reduction of radiation dose in the cardiac catheterization
laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:159-162.
99.
Ammann E. X-ray generator and AEC design. In: Seibert
JA, Barnes GT, Gould RG, eds. Specification, Acceptance
Testing and Quality Control of Diagnostic X-Ray Imaging
Equipment. Medical Physics Monograph No. 20. Woodbury,
NY: American Institute of Physics, Inc.; 1991; p. 233-265.
100.
Moore RJ. Imaging Principles of Cardiac Angiography.
Rockville, MD: Aspen Publishers; 1990.
101.
Chotas HG, Dobbins JT, III, Ravin CE. Principles of
digital radiography with large-area, electronically
readable detectors: a review of the basics. Radiology.
1999;210:595-599.
102.
Antonuk LE, Yorkston J, Huang W, et al. A real-time,
flat-panel, amorphous silicon, digital x-ray imager.
Radiographics. 1995;15:993-1000.
103.
Radiological Society of North America, Nikoloff EL,
Strauss KJ. 1998 syllabus: categorical course in diagnostic
radiology physics: cardiac catheterization imaging.
Oak Brook, Ill: The Society; 1998.
104.
Cusma JT, Wondrow MA, Holmes DR. Replacement of cinefilm
with a digital archive and review network. Int J
Card Imaging. 1998;14:293-300.
105.
Wilson DL, Jabri KN, Aufrichtig R. Perception of temporally
filtered X-ray fluoroscopy images. IEEE Trans Med
Imaging. 1999;18:22-31.
106.
Nissen SE, Pepine CJ, Bashore TM. Cardiac angiography
without cine film: erecting a "Tower of Babel" in the
cardiac catheterization laboratory. American College
of Cardiology Cardiac Catheterization Committee. J
Am Coll Cardiol. 1994;24:834-837.
107.
American College of Cardiology, American College of
Radiology and industry develop standard for digital
transfer of angiographic images. ACC/ACR/NEMA Ad Hoc
Group. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995;25:800-802.
108.
Rabbani M, Jones PW. Image compression techniques for
medical diagnostic imaging systems. J Digit Imaging.
1991;4:65-78.
109.
Nissen SE, Hirshfeld JW, Jr, Simon R. Introduction and
background: the International Angiographic Compression
study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35:1367-1369.
110.
Goldberg MA. Teleradiology and telemedicine. Radiol
Clin North Am. 1996;34:647-665.
111.
Reiber JH, van der Zwet PM, Koning G, et al. Accuracy
and precision of quantitative digital coronary arteriography:
observer-, short-, and medium-term variabilities. Cathet
Cardiovasc Diagn. 1993;28:187-198.
112.
Sheehan FH . Principles and Practice of Contrast Ventriculography.
In: Skorton DJ, Schelbert HR, Wolf GL, Brundage BH,
Braunwald E, eds. Marcus Cardiac Imaging: A Companion
to Braunwald's Heart Disease. 2nd ed. Philadelphia,
Pa: Saunders; 1996; 19, p. 164-187.
113.
Bidgood WD, Jr. Clinical importance of the DICOM structured
reporting standard. Int J Card Imaging. 1998;14:307-315.
114. Weintraub WS. Clinical cardiovascular databases:
ready for prime time? [editorial; comment]. Am Heart
J. 1998;136:751-752.
115.
Balter S. An overview of radiation safety regulatory
recommendations and requirements. Catheter Cardiovasc
Interv. 1999;47:469-474.
116. Balter S. Radiation safety in the cardiac catheterization
laboratory: operational radiation safety. Catheter
Cardiovasc Interv. 1999;47:347-353.
117. Zorzetto M, Bernardi G, Morocutti G, Fontanelli
A. Radiation exposure to patients and operators during
diagnostic catheterization and coronary angioplasty.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;40:348-351.
118. Finci L, Meier B, Steffenino G, Roy P, Rutishauser
W. Radiation exposure during diagnostic catheterization
and single- and double-vessel percutaneous transluminal
coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:1401-1403.
119. Dash H, Leaman DM. Operator radiation exposure
during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1984;4:725-728.
120. Renaud L. A 5-year follow-up of the radiation
exposure to in-room personnel during cardiac catheterization.
Health Phys. 1992;62:10-15.
121. National Research Council (U.S.) Committee
on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations. Health
effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation:
BEIR V/Committee on Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiations,
Board of Radiation Effects Research, Commission on Life
Science, National Research Council. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press; 1990.
122. Boring CC, Squires TS, Tong T. Cancer statistics,
1991 [published erratum appears in CA Cancer J Clin
1991;4:111]. CA Cancer J Clin. 1991;41:19-36.
123. United Nations Scientific Committee on the
Effects of Atomic Radiation.United Nations.General Assembly.
Genetic and somatic effects of ionizing radiation: United
Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic
Radiation: 1986 report to the General Assembly, with
annexes. New York, NY: United Nations; 1986.
124. Hall EJ. Radiobiology for the Radiologist.
4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1994.
125. Pitney MR, Allan RM, Giles RW, et al. Modifying
fluoroscopic views reduces operator radiation exposure
during coronary angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol.
1994;24:1660-1663.
126. Vitiello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D, Freedom
RM, Benson LN. Complications associated with pediatric
cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1433-1440.
127. Fellows KE, Radtke W, Keane JF, Lock JE. Acute
complications of catheter therapy for congenital heart
disease. Am J Cardiol. 1987;60:679-683.
128. Allen HD, Mullins CE. Results of the Valvuloplasty
and Angioplasty of Congenital Anomalies Registry. Am
J Cardiol. 1990;65:772-774.
129. Dubin AM, Van Hare GF. Radiofrequency catheter
ablation: indications and complications. Pediatr
Cardiol. 2000;21:551-556.
130. American Academy of Pediatrics, Section on
Cardiology: guidelines for pediatric diagnostic and
treatment centers. Pediatrics. 1991;87:576-580.
131. Allen HD, Beekman RH, Garson AJ, et al. Pediatric
therapeutic cardiac catheterization: a statement for
healthcare professionals from the Council on Cardiovascular
Disease in the Young, American Heart Association [published
erratum appears in Circulation 1998;97:2375]. Circulation.
1998;97:609-625.
© 2001 by the American College of Cardiology and
Society
for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions
|
