|
Though
its philosophical origins are said to date back to mid-19th
century Paris, evidence-based medicine has been defined in
more modern times as "the conscientious, explicit, and
judicious use of current best evidence in making decisions
about the care of individual patients. The practice of evidence
based medicine means integrating individual clinical expertise
with the best available external clinical evidence from systematic
research." (BMJ, 13 Jan 96, Sackett, David L.).
Even
for the most scholarly of practicing physicians, attempting
to stay current with the abundance of clinical research evidence
presently available is a daunting task. And while clinical
experience and expertise is critical, its efficacy is strengthened
with evidence from systematic research. In addition, a physician
with knowledge of clinical evidence alone cannot deliver supportive,
compassionate care without clinical skill accrued through
years of experience.
For
nearly 20 years, the American College of Cardiology and the
American Heart Association have partnered to develop guidelines
for evidence-based cardiovascular care. Our guidelines
development manual methodologies have evolved over the
years as we learned first hand the complexities of combining
research findings and clinical judgment to create the best
possible recommendations for patient care. Despite this experience,
guideline writing groups still frequently face new challenges
that result in a reassessment and modification of our policies.
Additionally, we monitor the international literature on guidelines
development to compare our strategies with other rigorous
efforts. As such, our methodologies are frequently modified
and expanded to reflect our commitment to providing a scientifically
sound structure for guideline development.
Today,
our commitment to ensuring high quality care for patients
with cardiovascular disease remains the driving force behind
our evidence-based efforts.
|