Glucose-Lowering Drugs and Heart Failure Risk

Study Questions:

What are the effects of the three classes of glucose-lowering drugs, viz., glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitors, and sodium glucose co-transporter (SGLT)-2 inhibitors, on hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2DM)?

Methods:

The study authors searched Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov between December 1, 2008, and November 24, 2017, for randomized placebo-controlled trials. Studies were considered eligible for inclusion if they: 1) were randomized, placebo-controlled trials conducted in adults with T2DM; 2) compared add-on therapy of any current antidiabetic medication to placebo; and 3) reported incidence of HF or hospitalization for HF as a primary or secondary outcome. Exclusion criteria were as follows: observational and retrospective studies, studies completed before Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance, and studies that did not report HF as an outcome. Nine trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria, providing data on 87,162 participants. As per the inclusion criteria, they were placebo-controlled trials that evaluated the following classes of antidiabetic medication: GLP-1 agonists (four studies evaluating lixisenatide, liraglutide, semaglutide, and once-weekly exenatide, respectively, in 33,457 participants), DPP-4 inhibitors (three studies evaluating alogliptin, saxagliptin, and sitagliptin, respectively, in 36,543 participants), and SGLT-2 inhibitors (two studies evaluating empagliflozin and canagliflozin in 17,162 participants). The authors performed network meta-analyses by Bayesian approach using Markov chain Monte Carlo simulation method to compare the effects of glucose-lowering drugs on risk of HF hospitalization and estimate the probability that each treatment is the most effective.

Results:

The study populations had a mean age ranging from 60.3-65.5 years, with a male preponderance (60.7%-71.6%) and mean duration of T2DM ranging from 7.2-13.9 years. Reflecting contemporary management of cardiovascular risk factors, the majority of participants were receiving statins (71.5%-92.7%), aspirin (63.3%-97.5%), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (33.7%-85%). The study investigators found that in their network meta-analysis, SGLT-2 inhibitors yielded the greatest risk reduction for HF hospitalization compared with placebo (relative risk [RR], 0.56; 95% credibility interval [CrI], 0.43-0.72). Moreover, SGLT-2 inhibitors were associated with significant risk reduction in pairwise comparisons with both GLP-1 agonists (RR, 0.59; 95% CrI, 0.43-0.79) and DPP-4 inhibitors (RR, 0.50; 95% CrI, 0.36-0.70). Ranking of the classes revealed 99.6% probability of SGLT-2 inhibitors being the optimal treatment for reducing the risk of this outcome, followed by GLP-1 agonists (0.27%) and DPP-4 inhibitors (0.1%).

Conclusions:

The authors concluded that SGLT-2 inhibitors are more effective than either GLP-1 agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors for reducing the risk of hospitalization for HF in T2DM.

Perspective:

This is an important study because it suggests that antidiabetic medications have disparate effects on the natural history of HF despite similar glucose-lowering effects. Mechanistic studies are now needed to determine whether indeed their impact is independent of glucose-lowering on myocardial energetics. This study also suggests that prescription of these medications will require evaluation of HF risk in any given patient with T2DM.

Keywords: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Aspirin, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors, Dipeptidyl-Peptidases and Tripeptidyl-Peptidases, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Glucose, Glucosides, Heart Failure, Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors, Metabolic Syndrome, Peptides, Primary Prevention, Risk Factors, Risk Reduction Behavior, Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins


< Back to Listings