A Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial of Renal Sympathetic Denervation in Mild Resistant Hypertension - Symplicity Flex
Description:
The SYMPLICITY-HTN 3 trial failed to demonstrate a reduction in blood pressure from renal sympathetic denervation compared with sham among individuals with severe refractory hypertension (n = 535 patients). The goal of the current trial was to evaluate renal sympathetic denervation compared with sham among participants with mild resistant hypertension.
Hypothesis:
Renal sympathetic denervation will improve blood pressure.
Study Design
- Randomized
- Blinded
- Parallel
Patient Populations:
- Participants with mild resistant hypertension
- Mean daytime ambulatory systolic blood pressure 135-149 mm Hg and/or mean diastolic blood pressure 90-94 mm Hg
- ≥3 antihypertensive medications and stable dosage within the last 4 weeks
- ≥18 years to ≤75 years
Number of enrollees: 71
Duration of follow-up: 6 months
Mean patient age: 65 years
Percentage female: 23%
Exclusions:
- Unsuitable anatomy for renal sympathetic denervation
- Estimated glomerular filtration rate <45 ml/min/1.73 m2
Primary Endpoints:
- Change in 24-hour systolic blood pressure at 6 months
Drug/Procedures Used:
Participants with mild resistant hypertension were randomized to renal sympathetic denervation with the Symplicity Flex catheter (n = 35) versus sham procedure (n = 36).
Renal sympathetic denervation consisted of 4-6 circumferential ablation runs of 2 minutes. Sham procedure consisted of renal angiography and acoustic signals to mimic the denervation procedure, and saline infusion to mimic analgesic medications.
Principal Findings:
Overall, 71 patients were randomized. The mean age was 65 years, 23% were women, mean body mass index was 32 kg/m2, and 54% had diabetes. The mean number of antihypertensive medications was 4.4.
The mean change in 24-hour blood pressure (intention to treat) was -7.0 mm Hg in the renal denervation group versus -3.5 mm Hg in the sham group (p = 0.15). The mean change in 24-hour blood pressure (treatment received) was -8.3 mm Hg in the renal denervation group versus -3.5 mm Hg in the sham group (p = 0.042).
Interpretation:
Among patients with mild resistant hypertension on a mean of 4.4 antihypertensive medications, renal denervation failed to reduce the mean ambulatory blood pressure at 6 months. However, analysis according to actual treatment received suggested a benefit from renal denervation. The current study is limited by small sample size and no urine analysis to assess medication adherence.
References:
Presented by Dr. Steffen Desch at the Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics meeting (TCT 2014), Washington, DC, September 16, 2014.
Clinical Topics: Prevention, Hypertension
Keywords: Medication Adherence, Denervation, Body Mass Index, Sympathectomy, Intention to Treat Analysis, Blood Pressure Determination, Hypertension, Diabetes Mellitus
< Back to Listings