Adverse Drug Reactions to Heart Failure Drugs in Women

Study Questions:

What are the gender differences in adverse drug reactions (ADRs) to heart failure (HF) medication?

Methods:

The study authors performed a systematic search in PubMed and EMBASE to collect all available information on ADRs to guideline-recommended HF drugs—particularly angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), beta-blockers, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), ivabradine, and digoxin—in both women and men with HF. They excluded studies with study populations too small for sex-stratified analyses (n = <50 patients), where the primary study population was not HF specific or had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction due to a recent myocardial infarction, where the results could not be linked back to one specific drug or where the drug was administered intravenously, where the drug was administered only once to evaluate first-dose effects, and all studies for which the full text could not be retrieved. The study authors extracted the population size, percentage of women and mean age of the study population, the description of the ADR type(s) reported, and the sex-specific ADR results from all included studies. A meta-analysis was not performed due to heterogeneity. The data are presented separately for each of the five drug categories.

Results:

The search returned 9,424 unique articles, of which 356 were eligible for full-text screening. Most of these studies were excluded due to the lack of gender-specific data (n = 144, 40%) or because the study design did not match the search criteria (n = 96, 27%). Of the remaining articles (n = 116), 25 did not provide ADR data, 19 were written in a different language, 13 were duplicates, and for 48, the full text could not be located. The search identified 155 eligible records, of which only 11 (7%) reported ADR data for women and men separately. The 11 studies included 153,945 individuals with a mean age of 64 years (52-75 years) and included on average 25% women (13%-49%), which was similar to the 144 excluded studies (29%). Four studies (36%) reported more ADRs in women compared with men, while one study (9%) reported more ADRs in men. The remaining six studies (55%) reported no difference in ADRs between the sexes. Six studies were post hoc analyses from randomized clinical trials, two used data from healthcare insurance claims databases, and the remaining three used patient cohorts from HF clinics. Gender-stratified reporting of ADRs did not increase over the last decades. Three studies reported a higher risk of ACEI-related ADRs in women, one study showed higher digoxin-related mortality risk for women, and one study reported a higher risk of MRA-related ADRs in men. No gender differences in ADRs were reported for ARBs and beta-blockers. Gender-stratified data were not available for ivabradine.

Conclusions:

The study authors concluded that there is a scarcity of ADR data stratified by sex and called for a change in standard scientific practice toward reporting of ADR data for women and men separately.

Perspective:

As we strive towards precision medicine, the paucity of gender-specific data on ADR with guideline-directed medical therapy is of concern, particularly when the available data suggest a higher risk in women. This is a clarion call for the Heart Failure Society of America; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Food and Drug Administration; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; European Society of Cardiology; and the American Heart Association and American College of Cardiology to work together to collect more gender-specific data on ADR in HF patients.

Keywords: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Angiotensin II Type 2 Receptor Blockers, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Cardiovascular Agents, Digoxin, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions, Heart Failure, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Risk, Secondary Prevention, Sex Characteristics, Women


< Back to Listings