Trends of Pulmonary Catheterization in HF

Study Questions:

Would invasive monitoring improve outcomes in patients with cardiogenic shock in the contemporary era?

Methods:

This was a retrospective cohort study with the use of the National Inpatients Sample database from 2004 to 2014. Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare proportions and continuous variables for the differences in the baseline characteristics of patients. Univariate linear and logistic regression models were created to compare continuous and categoric outcomes among study groups.

Results:

A total of 9,431,944 patients was hospitalized with primary diagnosis of heart failure (HF) (n = 8,516,528) and cardiogenic shock (n = 915, 416) during the 2004-2014 study period. Patients with cardiogenic shock represented 51% of all pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) use. In patients with cardiogenic shock, the patients with PAC were younger than those without PAC (64 ± 15 vs. 68 ± 14; p < 0.001) and were more commonly male (63.8% vs. 59.3%). Primary diagnosis was ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (24.3%), followed by non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (12.9%), acute HF (11.4%), and sepsis (9.3%). The use of PAC in patients with HF without cardiogenic shock was associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital mortality (9.9% vs. 3.3%; odds ratio [OR] 3.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.68-4.26; p < 0.001). In patients with HF who were in cardiogenic shock, there was a reduction in mortality when PAC was used (35.1% vs. 39.2%; OR 0.91; 95% CI, 0.88-0.95; p < 0.001). In patients with cardiogenic shock, PAC was associated with lower rates of in-hospital cardiac arrest compared with those with cardiogenic shock and no PAC (14.9% vs. 18.3%; OR 0.77; 95% CI, 0.74-0.81; p < 0.001). Between 2004 and 2014, there was a 39% absolute reduction in mortality with use of PAC in patients with and without cardiogenic shock.

Conclusions:

The use of PAC in patients with HF and cardiogenic shock has shown to improve mortality and lower rates of in-hospital cardiac arrest. Patients who are not in cardiogenic shock had worse outcomes with PAC than without.

Perspective:

Previous studies have reported an increase in mortality with the use of PAC. This study supports the use of PAC in patients with cardiogenic shock to improve patient outcomes. The authors of the study speculated that the results were due to improved patient selection or the application of the information to guide patient care.

Clinical Topics: Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Acute Heart Failure

Keywords: Catheterization, Swan-Ganz, Shock, Cardiogenic, Pulmonary Artery, Heart Failure, Hospital Mortality, Inpatients


< Back to Listings