Atrial Remodeling Caused by Sustained AFL vs. AF

Quick Takes

  • AFL and AF both remodel the atrium, but only AF causes inflammatory signaling and fibrosis.
  • Early intervention may be important to prevent irreversible fibrosis when AF intervenes in a patient with AFL.

Study Questions:

What are the characteristics of structural atrial remodeling in sustained atrial flutter (AFL) vs. sustained atrial fibrillation (AF), and what is the impact of AF/AFL on susceptibility to future arrhythmia?

Methods:

Intercaval radiofrequency lesions were created to produce a substrate for sustained isthmus-dependent AFL. Four groups (six dogs per group) were followed for 3 weeks: 1) sustained AFL; 2) sustained AF; 3) AF superimposed on an AFL substrate (AF+AFLs); 4) sinus rhythm (SR) with an AFL substrate (SR+AFLs; control group). All dogs had atrioventricular-node ablation and ventricular pacemakers at 80 bpm to control ventricular rate.

Results:

Left atrial effective refractory period was reduced similarly with AFL, AF+AFLs, and AF, while AF vulnerability to extrastimuli increased in all groups. Induced AF duration increased significantly in AF+AFLs and AF, but not AFL. Left atrial volume increased in dogs with AF+AFLs and AF, but not those with AFL, versus SR+AFLs. Optical mapping showed significant conduction slowing in AF+AFLs and AF but not AFL, paralleling atrial fibrosis and collagen-gene upregulation. There was significant dysregulation of inflammatory and extracellular matrix-signaling pathways with AF and AF+ALs but not AFL.

Conclusions:

Sustained AFL causes atrial repolarization changes like those in AF but, unlike AF or AF+AFLs, does not induce structural remodeling.

Perspective:

The impact of sustained AF on atrial electrical and structural remodeling has been previously well described. Animals and humans with sustained AF have shorter action potential duration and effective atrial refractory period, which makes them vulnerable to AF initiation. Additionally, AF causes slowing in atrial conduction, activation of inflammation, fibrosis, and left atrial dilation. In the present study, the authors show that sustained AFL shortens atrial refractory period and action potential duration similar to that caused by AF, along with significantly enhanced vulnerability to atrial tachyarrhythmia induction by atrial extrasystoles, but it does not result in the slowing of atrial conduction, activation of inflammation, and fibrosis. Thus, AFL does not contribute to the perpetuation of future AF episodes. Additional inference from these data are that conduction disturbances and fibrosis in AFL patients are likely caused by the primary atrial cardiomyopathy, not AFL itself. Interventions targeting inflammatory signaling to prevent fibrosis caused by AF are likely to have a major impact on the disease management.

Clinical Topics: Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Cardiovascular Care Team, Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Prevention, Implantable Devices, EP Basic Science, SCD/Ventricular Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias, Acute Heart Failure

Keywords: Ablation Techniques, Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Flutter, Atrial Premature Complexes, Atrial Remodeling, Atrioventricular Node, Cardiomyopathies, Dilatation, Fibrosis, Heart Atria, Heart Failure, Inflammation, Pacemaker, Artificial, Secondary Prevention, Tachycardia, Up-Regulation


< Back to Listings