ICD System Shock Function, Mortality, and Cause of Death After MRI
Quick Takes
- Non–MRI-conditional ICDs treated and detected tachyarrhythmias after MRI at 1.5 magnetic field strength.
- No clinically significant functional changes in non–MRI-conditional ICDs occurred (theoretically due to heating at the lead-tissue interface, lead or generator dislodgement, or hardware or software damage).
Study Questions:
What is the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock function and mortality, including cause of death during long-term follow-up of patients with non–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-conditional ICDs who had MRI?
Methods:
A total of 629 patients who had an ICD and clinical indication for MRI were enrolled consecutively after physician referral between February 2003–January 2015. Exclusion criteria included patients with new or newly adjusted leads (i.e., within 4 weeks), patients with permanent surgical epicardial leads and nonfunctional leads, patients with subcutaneous ICD systems, or patients who were pacing-dependent with an ICD without asynchronous pacing capability. Device reprogramming to asynchronous pacing method was performed for patients with an intrinsic heart rate of <40 bpm, and an inhibited pacing method was used for all other patients. Pacing features and therapies deactivated during MRI included those to treat tachyarrhythmias, premature ventricular complex detection, noise discrimination, rate response, and ventricular sense response. After MRI was complete, all devices were reprogrammed to their original settings. MRIs were performed with a standard magnetic field strength of 1.5 Tesla. ICD device interrogations were performed at baseline and immediately after MRI completion. Thereafter, devices were interrogated at least every 6 months and more often for symptom-driven reasons. Follow-up interrogation was stopped at the last available consecutive interrogation after MRI or when all MRI-exposed device components (i.e., generator and leads) were replaced or removed. Death data were obtained from clinical records, obituaries, and death certificates. Deaths were classified as either cardiac or noncardiac, and cardiovascular deaths were classified as arrhythmia-related or non–arrhythmia-related.
Results:
Of the 813 MRIs performed on 629 patients with an ICD, all MRIs were completed except one early termination due to a power-on reset. After MRI, follow-up data on interrogations were available for 536 (85%) patients. Of those, 299 patients had no detected arrhythmic episodes. The remaining 237 patients had 4,177 episodes. Median follow-up time was 2.6 years (interquartile range [IQR], 1.7-3.7 years). The median time from MRI to first ICD therapy (i.e., pacing or shocks) for ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation was 12.1 months (IQR, 3.4-25.8 months); median time to first shock was 16.8 months (IQR, 5.5-29.1 months). For supraventricular tachycardia, the median time from MRI to first ICD therapy was 9.8 months (IQR, 3.9-22 months); median time to first shock was 10.7 months (IQR, 5.9-19.4 months).
After MRI and before generator or lead exchange occurred, 210 (33%) patients were known to have died. The median time from MRI to death was 1.7 years (IQR, 0.5-4 years; range, 7 days-11.5 years after MRI); 74 (12%) patients died within 12 months, and 134 (21%) patients died within 3 years of MRI. Ten (5%) of the 210 deaths were due to cardiac arrhythmic-related causes, 76 (36%) deaths were due to cardiac non–arrhythmic-related causes, 110 (52%) were noncardiac deaths, and 14 (7%) causes of death were unknown. The median age of death was 71 years (IQR, 62-78 years).
Conclusions:
In the cohort of 629 patients with non–MRI-conditional ICD devices who were followed prospectively after MRI, no direct evidence of ICD failure to deliver therapy was found. None of the 210 deaths were attributable to prior MRI exposure. These findings are consistent with previous studies, indicating that 1.5 Tesla MRI scans do not induce clinically significant functional changes in non–MRI-conditional ICDs.
Perspective:
Providing safe and effective care is paramount in the management of patients living with ICDs. This study contributes to the culminating body of evidence on the safety of 1.5 Tesla MRI scans among patients with non–MRI-conditional ICDs. In this longitudinal cohort study, patients with non–MRI-conditional ICDs who had an MRI scan were prospectively followed for a median of 2.2 years and no adverse patient outcomes or ICD device performance were found, adding to the body of evidence on the safety of MRI scans in patients with non–MRI-conditional ICDs.
Clinical Topics: Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Heart Failure and Cardiomyopathies, Noninvasive Imaging, Prevention, Implantable Devices, EP Basic Science, SCD/Ventricular Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias, Acute Heart Failure, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Keywords: Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Defibrillators, Implantable, Diagnostic Imaging, Heart Failure, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Patient Care Team, Secondary Prevention, Shock, Tachycardia, Supraventricular, Tachycardia, Ventricular, Ventricular Fibrillation, Ventricular Premature Complexes
< Back to Listings