Outcomes of Heart Transplant Donation After Circulatory Death

Quick Takes

  • In this study, 1-year survival among recipients of hearts donated after circulatory death (DCD), primarily recovered using normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), was similar to that of hearts donated after brain death (DBD).
  • DCD heart recipients appear to have similar incidence of primary graft dysfunction, rejection, or cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) at 1 year and similar length of stay and readmission rates at 30 days and 1 year to DBD recipients.
  • Larger multicenter studies are required to evaluate the impact of preservation strategies and recovery techniques on outcomes and to fully evaluate post-transplant outcomes, such as CAV, which may occur beyond 1 year.

Study Questions:

Do post-transplant outcomes differ between recipients of donation after circulatory death (DCD) heart donors and recipients of donation after brain death (DBD) heart donors?

Methods:

This is a single-center, retrospective analysis of adult heart transplant recipients who received hearts from DCD and DBD donors at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) between January 1, 2020, and January 28, 2023. Hearts from DCD donors were recovered using either ex vivo machine perfusion (EVP) or normothermic regional perfusion (NRP), and hearts from DBD donors were recovered using either EVP or static cold storage. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare continuous variables and the chi-squared test was used to evaluate categorical variables. Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis and log-rank tests to compare survival curves for the two groups.

Results:

Between January 2020 and January 2023, 385 patients underwent heart transplant at VUMC: 263 received DBD hearts and 122 received DCD hearts. The median follow-up time was 511 days. Compared to DBD donors, DCD donors were younger, more likely to be White, and more likely to be male; they were also less likely to have hypertension, significant smoking history, or positive nucleic acid test for hepatitis C. DCD donors more often died of blunt injury, while DBD donors tended to die of drug intoxication. DCD recipients were more often male and White, and had significantly higher body mass index and glomerular filtration rate. They were less often on temporary mechanical support or hospitalized prior to transplant and more often supported by left ventricular assist device at the time of transplant. Eighty-three percent of the DCD hearts were recovered using NRP and 17% recovered using EVP; 96% of DBD hearts were recovered using static cold storage.

One-year survival after transplant was 94.3% in the DCD recipients and 92.4% in the DBD recipients (hazard ratio, 0.77; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-1.81; p = 0.54). Survival to discharge, at 30 days, and at 6 months was similar between DCD and DBD recipients. The incidence of severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) was 5.75% in both groups (p = 0.99). Finally, there was no difference in cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV), treated rejection, median hospital length of stay (LOS) or readmission within 30 days between DCD and DBD recipients.

Conclusions:

Recipients of DCD heart recipients have similar 1-year survival and similar occurrences of severe PGD, CAV, and treated rejection at 1 year when compared to DBD recipients. Median LOS and readmissions at 30 days and 1 year are also similar between DCD and DBD recipients.

Perspective:

The need for donor hearts continues to exceed their availability, thereby limiting access to this life-saving therapy. The use of DCD hearts has increased substantially, from eight cases in 2019 to 480 to date (based on Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data as of October 9, 2023). While the use of DCD hearts may have contributed to shorter wait times and increased transplant rate, studies comparing post-transplant outcomes of DCD recipients to DBD recipients have been limited.

In the largest single-center comparison to date, in which the majority of DCD hearts were recovered using NRP, the authors demonstrated that the key outcomes of 1-year survival, severe PGD, CAV, and rejection were comparable between recipients of DCD hearts and recipients of DBD hearts. In addition, median LOS and readmission at 30 days and 1 year were also similar.

The heart transplant community continues to debate how best to manage patients with advanced heart failure. It has been projected that the use of DCD donor hearts has the potential to increase the number of heart transplants by 30%. While this study is reassuring regarding 1-year outcomes, larger multicenter studies and longer-term follow-up will be necessary to better address the impact of recovery techniques, preservation strategies, and surgical experience, and transplant-related outcomes.

Clinical Topics: Cardiac Surgery, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Vascular Medicine, Cardiac Surgery and Heart Failure, Heart Transplant, Interventions and Vascular Medicine

Keywords: Acute Heart Failure, Brain Death, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Heart Transplantation, Primary Graft Dysfunction


< Back to Listings