Very Low Carbohydrate and Ketogenic Diets and Cardiometabolic Risk


Nutrition science has confirmed that the quality of dietary macronutrients (fats, carbohydrates, and proteins) significantly impacts biomarkers and hard endpoints for coronary heart disease (CHD). These data have led to evidence-based recommendations to restrict dietary saturated fats (SFAs), refined carbohydrate (CHO) foods, and protein from animal sources, and to replace these with unsaturated fats, unprocessed CHO in the form of whole grains, fruits and vegetables, and proteins from plant sources.1,2 However, 25 years into the twin epidemics of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM), a class of therapeutic diets focused primarily on the distribution of macronutrients has grown in popularity. These diets restrict CHO intake to varying degrees, liberalize fat intake, and side-step many of the dietary recommendations above. The most extreme of these, the very-low-CHO-diet/ketogenic diet (VLCD/KD), has been reported to induce weight loss without hunger and, in those with pre-diabetes or T2DM, to markedly improve blood glucose and triglyceride (TG) levels. However, recent reviews and summaries of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort data with long-term follow-up, including by the National Lipid Association,3 provide important perspective. This review will help you understand and recognize VLCDs, determine whether they are truly ketogenic, and identify potential risks or benefits for individual patients.

Understanding Nutritional Ketosis

Severe dietary CHO-restriction induces marked and rapid effects on intermediary metabolism. Glycogen stores become rapidly depleted, insulin levels fall, and free fatty acids (FFAs) are mobilized from peripheral fat stores. Once in the liver, FFAs undergo mitochondrial beta-oxidation to form acetoacetyl-CoA and, eventually, the ketone body beta-hydroxybutyrate (ßHB). After secretion into the circulation, ßHB becomes a fuel molecule for the brain and other tissues, where it is turned back into acetyl-Co-A and enters the TCA cycle.4 ßHB also plays roles in cholesterol synthesis and de novo lipogenesis and, based on newer data, in cellular pathways that influence gene transcription, cell redox potentials and oxidant stress, the latter with favorable effects in some tissues.5

Recognizing VLCDs and Ketogenic Diets

A wide range of CHO-restricted diets exists (Table 1). VLCDs restrict CHO to <50 grams/day (or < 200 kcals/day since each gram of CHO provides 4 kcals of energy). This amounts to <10% of total daily energy (TDE), or calories, from CHO for the average 2,000 kcal/day diet, an amount far lower than the recommended acceptable macronutrient range for CHO, which is 45-65% of total calories, or 225-325 grams of CHO per day for a 2,000 kcal/day diet.6 The most practical way to recognize whether a patient is following a VLCD is to query them about what they are eating, noting the absence of breads, cereals, grains, legumes, starchy vegetables, fruits, and grain-based desserts.

Table 1

If calories are kept equal, it follows that a VLCD must be higher in protein and/or fat. However, VLCDs that are too high in protein cannot be ketogenic, as several amino acids are glucogenic and suppress ketogenesis.7 Thus, a true KD limits protein intake to ≤1.5 grams per kilogram (kg) of body weight per day (or 105 grams per day for a 70 kg adult). Individuals on VLCDs who report eating large quantities of beef, pork, chicken, fish, eggs, and dairy products are unlikely achieving ketosis. In contrast, a VLCD/KD that restricts both CHO and protein must, therefore, be very high in fat, typically 70-80% of TDE or calories. Individuals usually report high intakes of butter, cheese, coconut oil, beef and pork (which are high in SFAs), olive, canola, or avocado oils (high in mono- and poly-unsaturated fats), and whole eggs (high in cholesterol). A mathematical relationship between ketogenic versus non-ketogenic macronutrients, called the Ketogenic Ratio (KR), identifies whether a diet is ketogenic, but is rarely used clinically.8 Medically supervised VLCDs that severely restrict calories to <800 day are usually ketogenic.3

Potential Cardiometabolic Benefits of VLCDs/KDs

Weight Loss
Compared to high-CHO-low fat diets, VLCDs are associated with greater initial weight loss. One mechanism is water loss: CHO-restriction leads to diuresis. VLCDs/KDs have also been associated with small increases in energy expenditure of 50-200 kcal per day, as well appetite suppression, adipocyte lipolysis, and thermogenesis, all of which also contribute to weight loss.3 However, several meta-analyses and reviews have found that VLCDs are associated with greater weight loss compared to higher-CHO-low fat diets only when both are hypocaloric and only up to 1-2 years, after which weight loss is similar.3  In individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes, greater weight loss has been observed only up to 6 months.3 Moreover, most studies have shown reduced adherence to VLCDs over time. A large meta-analysis also showed that loss of lean body mass is greater on VLCDs, which can be offset by higher protein intake.3  Based on these and other data, the 2013 Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults did not endorse VLCDs.9

Blood TG levels are inversely associated with CHO intake. In the latest meta-regression of 84 RCTs, each 1% of energy from SFA that is replaced with CHO raises blood TGs by approximately 1 mg/dl (0.97 mg/dL, or 0.011 mmol/L).10 In those with cardiometabolic risk, effects can be significant. In the National Lipid Association (NLA) review of meta-analyses of RCTs of VLCDs (<10% CHO as energy) versus low-CHO diets (10 to <45% of energy) or high-CHO diets (>45% of energy) in adults with overweight/obesity and/or T2DM, CHO restriction was associated with decreased TGs in 10 of 13 meta-analyses. In the seven meta-analyses in participants with overweight/obesity, TG changes ranged from -5.31 mg/dL (95%CI, -12.4 to 2.66) to -28.8 mg/dL (95%CI, -39.1 to -18.5). In the six meta-analyses of CHO restriction in participants with prediabetes or T2DM, TG changes ranged from -7.09 mg/dL (95%CI, -43.4 to 23.0) to -29.2 mg/dL (95%CI, -39.9 to -18.6).3  In a review of the effects of four levels of CHO intake (moderate-low CHO, 40-45% of energy; low-CHO, 30-40% of energy; VLCD, 3-30% of energy; and a typical CHO diet, 45-55% of energy) in participants who had T2DM, overweight-obesity, elevated TGs, or were healthy controls, a dose-response effect was seen. Mean changes in TGs were: -23.9 mg/dL (or -0.27 mmol/L, 95%CI -0.43 to -0.10, P< 0.001) in eight RCTs of VLCDs; -15.9 mg/dL (or -0.18 mmol/L, 95%CI -0.26 to -0.11, P<0.001) in 16 RCTs of low-CHO diets; and -8.9 mg/dL (or -0.10 mmol/L, 95%CI -0.14 to -0.06, P< 0.001) in 13 RCTs of moderate-low-CHO diets.11 These data suggest that meaningful reductions in TGs can be achieved in low-CHO diets that are less restrictive than KDs.

Glycemic Control
Reducing CHO intake in select individuals with prediabetes or T2DM is a recommendation of the American Diabetes Association,12 and a Class IIb recommendation by the NLA in its statement on VLCDs.3 More recent data have provided additional information. In a 2019 meta-analysis of 19 RCTs of CHO-restriction in T2DM, a small but significant reduction in HbA1c was found only in studies up to 6 months duration, or in studies with a high risk of bias.13 Similarly, in a meta-analysis of 25 studies of CHO-restriction in T2DM, no difference in HbA1c was found in general or in the subgroup of eight studies of VLCDs (<50 g per day); however, a statistically significant decrease in HbA1c of 0.49% (95% CI, -0.75 to -0.23%, P <0.001) was found in the subgroup of five studies of low–CHO diets (i.e., 50 to 130 g CHO/day) over a median follow up of ≤6 months.14

Table 2

Potential Cardiometabolic Risks of VLCDs/KDs

Increased LDL-cholesterol
Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels have been observed in studies of VLCDs and KDs. Mechanisms include high intakes of dietary SFA and cholesterol, and changes in hepatic HMG Co-A, a substrate for cholesterol synthesis during ketogenesis.3-5 A 2006 meta-analysis of five RCTs of low-CHO versus low-fat diets in overweight individuals did not favor low-CHO diets, yielding a weighted mean difference in LDL-C of plus 5.4 mg/dl at 6 months and plus 7.7 mg/dl at 12 months compared to low-fat diets, despite greater weight loss.15 Similarly, in the NLA review, LDL-C was significantly increased in four of seven meta-analyses of studies of CHO-restriction in adults with overweight or obesity, and in six of seven meta-analyses of studies in adults with overweight/obesity and prediabetes/T2DM, although the latter did not achieve statistical significance.3  Importantly, studies of VLCDs/KDs that report median changes in LDL-C mask individual responses, which may be marked. Finally, in a RCT from 2008 that assigned 322 obese subjects to a LCD (vs. a low fat diet vs. a moderate fat Mediterranean) and reported a small 3 mg/dl decrease in LDL-C at 2 years, the CHO restricted dietary intervention was not a true VLCD/KD as CHO intake was 40% of calories by the end of the study, and subjects also received dietitian-led counseling to restrict SFA intake, likely limiting increases in LDL-C.16 

Decreased Intake of Beneficial Dietary Components
VLCDs and KDs restrict fiber-rich whole grains, beans, legumes and starchy vegetables, and most polyphenolic-containing fruits, all of which have been associated with reduced CHD risk and, in the case of whole grains, reduced mortality.17,18 Therefore, displacement of foods associated with cardioprotection is a major concern of VLCDs and KDs.

Increased Intake of Animal Protein
VLCDs and KDs liberalize intake of animal protein, specifically beef, pork, processed meats, and dairy products.  Since diets high in animal protein are associated with increase cardiovascular risk in prospective cohort studies,19 possibly driven by SFA, heme iron and/or trimethylamine-N-oxide (TMAO) production, VLCDs that liberalize animal protein should not be recommended for long-term use.

Possible Increase in Mortality
No long-term RCTs have reported the effects of VLCDs/KDs on hard endpoints. However, cohort data suggest caution. In the Atherosclerosis Research in the Community study of 15,000 subjects followed for a median of 25 years, the relationship between CHO intake and risk of total mortality was found to be U-shaped. Mortality risk was highest at a CHO intake of <50% of energy per day (Figure 1), especially when CHO was replaced by animal protein, leading the authors to conclude that "low carbohydrate diets should be discouraged."20 Two other recent analyses have shown similar findings.21,22

Figure 1

Figure 1
From Seidelmann, S et al. Lancet Public Health 2018;3:e419-428. Reprinted with permission.

Summary and Counseling Recommendations

For patients who report following a VLCD or KD, we recommend a clinician-patient discussion that reviews short-term risks and benefits based on the medical history and long-term health goals. As summarized in Table 3, based on RCTs, patients can be informed that hypocaloric (not ad libitum) VLCD/KDs may result in greater weight loss in the short term, but there is not one macronutrient mix that is superior for weight loss in the long term. In patients with diabetes, changes in glycemic control may be small. Moreover, although VLCDs result in greater TG-lowering, diets with less severe CHO-restriction may induce significant reductions in TGs and be easier to adhere to in the long term. Importantly, patients should be informed that VLCDs/KDs may worsen LDL-C levels and cardiovascular health in the long-term. Those with atherosclerosis should be counseled to avoid VLCDs that liberalize SFA intake and to undergo regular lipid testing (a Class–IIa recommendation by the NLA, Level of Evidence – B-R), and be considered for referral to a registered dietitian nutritionist, who can provide guidance on healthier strategies for patients who choose to significantly lower dietary CHO intake.3 Those who have atherosclerosis, atrial fibrillation, heart failure, kidney or liver disease, or who take anti-hypertensive medications or warfarin, should be informed of the need for greater supervision and possible medication adjustments while following a VLCD.3 Patients with strict contraindications to VLCD/KDs include those with a history of hypertriglyceridemic pancreatitis, severe hypertriglyceridemia, or familial hypercholesterolemia, as well as those on SGLT2 inhibitors, which may promote ketoacidosis.3 NLA provides this useful infographic on the potential benefits and risks of VLCD/KDs. Finally, patients should be encouraged to examine long-term health goals, and to re-introduce some amount of beneficial whole grains, fruits and/or vegetables in exchange for improved cardiovascular health, while receiving positive feedback for eliminating refined CHOs from their diets. Motivational interviewing techniques may greatly facilitate these discussions.

Table 3


  1. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2015-2020, Eighth Edition (HHS website). 2020. Available at: Accessed 08/30/2020.
  2. Arnett DK, Blumenthal RS, Albert MA, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2019;140:3596-646.
  3. Kirkpatrick CF, Bolick JP, Kris-Etherton PM, et al. Review of current evidence and clinical recommendations on the effects of low-carbohydrate and very low carbohydrate (including ketogenic) diets for the management of body weight and other cardiometabolic risk factors: a scientific statement from the National Lipid Association Nutrition and Lifestyle Taskforce. J Clin Lipidol 2019;13;689–711.
  4. Laffell, L. Ketone bodies: review of the physiology, pathophysiology and application of monitoring to diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 1999;15:412-26.
  5.   Dabek A, Wojtala M, Pirola L, Balcerczyk A. Modulation of cellular biochemistry, epigenetics, and metabolomics by ketone bodies. Implications of the ketogenic diet in the physiology of the organism and pathological states. Nutrients 2020;12:788.
  6. Dietary Reference Intakes for Energy, Carbohydrate, Fiber, Fat, Fatty Acids, Cholesterol, Protein, and Amino Acids (The National Academies Press website). 2005. Available at: Accessed 08/30/2020.
  7. Veldhorst M, Westerterp-Plantenga MS, Westerterp KR. Gluconeogenesis and energy expenditure after a high-protein, carbohydrate-free diet. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;90:519-26.
  8. Zilberter T, Zilberter Y. Ketogenic ratio determines metabolic effects of macronutrients and prevents interpretive bias. Front Nutr 2018;5:75.
  9. Jensen MD, Ryan DH, Apovian CM, et al. 2013 AHA/ACC/TOS guideline for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society. Circulation 2014;129(25 Supll 2):S102-S138.
  10. Mensink, RP. Effects of saturated fatty acids on serum lipids and lipoprotein: a systematic review and regression analysis. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016.
  11. Fechner E, Smeets, ETHC, Schrauwen P, Mensink RP. The effects of different degrees of carbohydrate restriction and replacement on crdiometabolic risk markers in humans: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients 2020;12:E991.
  12. Evert AB, Dennison M, Gardner CD, et al. Nutrition therapy for adults with diabetes and prediabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 2019;42:731-54.
  13. Korsmo-Haugen HK, Brurberg KG, Mann J, Aas AM, Carbohydrate quantity in the dietary management of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019;21:15-27.
  14. McArdle PD, Greenfield SM, Rilstone SK, Narendra P, Haque MS, Gill PS. Carbohydrate restriction for glycaemic control in Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med 2019;36:335-48.
  15. Nordmann AJ, Nordmann A, Briel J, et al.  Effects of low-carbohydrate vs. low-fat diets on weight loss and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:285-93.
  16. Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, et al. Weight loss with a low-carbohydrate, Mediterranean or low-fat diet. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229-41.
  17. Mozaffarian, D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease ,diabetes, obesity. Circulation 2016;133:187-225.
  18. Aune D, Keum N, Giovannucci E, et al. Whole grain consumption and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause and cause specific mortality: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies. BMJ 2016;353:i2716.
  19. Li S, Flint A, Pai JK, et al. Low carbohydrate diet from plant or animal sources and mortality among myocardial infarction survivors. J Am Heart Assoc 2014;3:e001169.
  20. Seidelmann S, Clagget B, Cheng S, et al. Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective study and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health 2018;3:e419-428.
  21. Noto H, Goto A, Tsujimoto T, Noda M. Low-carbohydrate diets and all cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. PLoS One 2013;8:e55030.
  22. Mazidi M, Katsiki N, Mikhailidis DP, Sattar N, Banach M. Lower carbohydrate diets and all-cause and cause-specific mortality: a population-based cohort study and pooling of prospective studies. Eur Heart J 2019;40:2870-9.

Clinical Topics: Anticoagulation Management, Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Cardiovascular Care Team, Diabetes and Cardiometabolic Disease, Dyslipidemia, Prevention, Anticoagulation Management and Atrial Fibrillation, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias, Lipid Metabolism, Nonstatins, Primary Hyperlipidemia, Diet

Keywords: Primary Prevention, Weight Loss, Blood Glucose, Prediabetic State, Vegetables, Fruit, Diet, Ketogenic, 3-Hydroxybutyric Acid, Fatty Acids, Nonesterified, Acetyl-CoA C-Acetyltransferase, Dichlorodiphenyldichloroethane, Olea, Cholesterol, LDL, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II, Warfarin, Hemoglobin A, Persea, Antihypertensive Agents, Nutritionists, Atrial Fibrillation

< Back to Listings