Racial Disparities in Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Quick Takes

  • Black patients were less likely to be transferred before repair, irrespective of the comorbidities or clinical stability.
  • Furthermore, Black patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms were also turned down for repair at significantly higher rates.
  • The association between race and insurance status with both transfer and turndown remains very concerning and calls for reassessment of transfer and operative protocols to ensure they are more robust against bias.

Study Questions:

What are the transfer rates, turndown rates, and outcomes for Black versus White patients presenting with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAAs)?

Methods:

The investigators examined all rAAA repairs in the Vascular Quality Initiative from 2003 to 2020 to evaluate the transfer rates and outcomes for Black versus White patients. They used the National Inpatient Sample from 2004 to 2015 to examine the turndown rates. Mixed effects logistic regression, Cox regression, and marginal effects modeling were used to study the interaction between race, insurance status, surgery type (open repair vs. endovascular aortic aneurysm repair), and hospital volume.

Results:

A total of 4,935 patients with rAAAs in the Vascular Quality Initiative (6.2% Black) and 48,489 in the National Inpatient Sample (6.0% Black) were identified. The rates of transfer were high; however, Black patients were significantly less likely to undergo transfer before repair compared with White patients (49% Black vs. 62% White; p = 0.002). The result was consistent in both crude and adjusted analyses when considering only stable patients and was not modified by insurance status, surgery type, or hospital volume. No significant differences were found in perioperative mortality (22% vs. 26%; p = 0.098) or complications (52% vs. 52%; p = 0.64). However, Black patients were significantly more likely to be turned down for repair (37% vs. 28%; odds ratio, 1.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-1.9; p < 0.001). A significant interaction was found between race and insurance status with respect to turndown. Patients with private insurance had undergone surgery at a similar rate, regardless of race. However, among patients with Medicare or Medicaid/self-pay, Black patients were less likely than were White patients to undergo repair (Medicare, 64% vs. 72%; p = 0.001; Medicaid/self-pay, 43% vs. 61%; p = 0.031). Patients with Medicaid/self-pay were also less likely to undergo repair than were patients of the same race with either Medicare or private insurance (p < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The authors report that Black patients with rAAAs are poorly served by the current systems of interhospital transfer in the United States, because they less often undergo transfer before repair.

Perspective:

This study reports that Black patients were less likely to be transferred before repair, irrespective of the comorbidities or clinical stability. Furthermore, Black patients with rAAAs were also turned down for repair at significantly higher rates. The association between race and insurance status with both transfer and turndown remains very concerning and calls for reassessment of transfer and operative protocols to ensure they are more robust against bias. Finally, additional studies are urgently needed to better understand the reasons underlying these disparities and to identify targets to improve the care of Black and possibly other minority patients with rAAAs.

Clinical Topics: Cardiac Surgery, Invasive Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention, Prevention, Vascular Medicine, Aortic Surgery, Cardiac Surgery and Arrhythmias, Interventions and Vascular Medicine

Keywords: African Americans, Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal, Aortic Rupture, Cardiac Surgical Procedures, Endovascular Procedures, Healthcare Disparities, Patient Care Team, Patient Transfer, Race Factors, Secondary Prevention, Vascular Diseases


< Back to Listings