Rule-Out of NSTE-ACS by a Prehospital Troponin Measurement

Quick Takes

  • The ARTICA trial assessed the 30-day health care costs and incidence of MACE in patients with suspected non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary in a prehospital rule-out strategy.
  • The study included a randomized controlled trial in five ambulance regions of the Netherlands, using the HEAR score for risk stratification and a point-of-care troponin measurement.
  • Patients in the prehospital rule-out strategy had a 29% lower health care resource use compared to the ED rule-out strategy. There was no difference in the incidence of MACE between the two groups.

Study Questions:

Does a prehospital rule-out strategy for patients suspected of non–ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), decrease costs of care and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE)?

Methods:

The ARTICA study is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted at five ambulance regions in the Netherlands. All ambulance paramedics were instructed to calculate the HEAR score (History, Electrocardiogram, Age, and Risk factors) and perform point-of-care troponin measurements. The study population consisted of low-risk chest pain patients suspected of NSTE-ACS, who had onset of symptoms ≥2 hours before ambulance presentation. Patients were randomized to either the prehospital rule-out strategy or the emergency department (ED) rule-out strategy. In the prehospital rule-out strategy, patients underwent an on-site point-of-care (POC) troponin T measurement. If POC troponin T was low (<40 ng/L), the care for the patient was transferred to the general practitioner. If POC troponin T was elevated (≥40 ng/L), the patient was transported to the ED. In the ED rule-out strategy, patients were transferred directly to the ED for additional testing. Follow-up was performed at 30 days through telephone and email, with data collected on all health care resource use and productivity losses. Health care resource use data were collected for all randomized patients, with costs determined according to the 2018 reference list of the Dutch National Healthcare Institute. The primary outcome was health care costs at 30 days. The secondary outcome was the incidence of MACE at 30 days.

Results:

This study included a total of 863 patients. ACS was ruled out in 96.5% of the total population, either in the prehospital setting or at the ED. MACE within 30 days occurred in 3.9% of patients in the prehospital rule-out strategy compared with 3.7% in the ED rule-out strategy (p = 0.89). Prehospital rule-out strategy had significantly lower health care costs (€1349 ± €2051 vs. €1960 ± €1808). The difference in cost was mainly driven by the pre-emption of ED visits and associated diagnostic tests. Pulmonary emboli occurred in 0.5% of patients in the prehospital rule-out strategy and 0.2% of patients in the ED rule-out strategy. No aortic dissections occurred in the total study population.

Conclusions:

A prehospital rule-out strategy for patients with suspected NSTE-ACS resulted in lower 30-day health care costs compared with an ED rule-out strategy, without a difference in 30-day MACE.

Perspective:

ARTICA provides insight into the potential of prehospital risk stratification of chest pain patients to reduce ED overcrowding and reduce costs. Reducing the burden on EDs is a major challenge for many health care systems. The ARTICA study provides evidence for the effectiveness of prehospital risk stratification as a way to improve outcomes and reduce costs.

Furthermore, the ARTICA study highlights the importance of the HEAR clinical risk score as a tool for prehospital risk stratification. This simple, yet effective tool can help ambulance paramedics accurately identify low-risk patients and provide them with appropriate care. Increasing the use of the HEAR clinical risk score can help reduce unnecessary hospital admissions and bring direct benefits to health care systems.

In addition, the study results demonstrate the feasibility of using POC troponin measurement in prehospital settings. The use of POC troponin allows for faster assessment and more accurate diagnosis, reducing the need for further testing and additional resources.

Overall, the ARTICA study provides valuable insight into the potential of prehospital risk stratification of chest pain patients and the advantages of using the HEAR clinical risk score and POC troponin measurement.

Clinical Topics: Acute Coronary Syndromes, Cardiovascular Care Team, Prevention, Stable Ischemic Heart Disease, Vascular Medicine, Chronic Angina

Keywords: Acute Coronary Syndrome, Chest Pain, Costs and Cost Analysis, Electrocardiography, Emergency Service, Hospital, Myocardial Ischemia, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction, Pulmonary Embolism, Risk Factors, Secondary Prevention, Troponin, Troponin T


< Back to Listings