Duration of ECG Monitoring of ED Patients With Syncope

Study Questions:

What is the incidence and time to arrhythmia occurrence following emergency department (ED) presentation for syncope?

Methods:

This was a prospective cohort study of adult patients presenting within 24 hours of syncope at six EDs. Canadian Syncope Risk Score (CSRS) was calculated for all patients. The investigators followed subjects for 30 days.

Results:

A total of 5,581 patients (mean age 53 years, 55% female, 12% hospitalized) were analyzed: 74% were classified as CSRS low-risk, 19% medium-risk, and 7% high-risk. The CSRS accurately stratified subjects as low (0.4% risk for 30-day arrhythmic outcome), medium (9% risk), and high (25% risk) risk. One-half of arrhythmic outcomes were identified within 2 hours of ED arrival in low-risk and within 6 hours in medium- and high-risk patients. Overall, 92% of arrhythmic outcomes among medium- and high-risk patients were identified within 15 days. None of the low-risk patients suffered ventricular arrhythmia or death, while 0.9% of medium-risk and 6.3% of high-risk patients suffered them (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions:

Serious underlying arrhythmia was often identified within the first 2 hours of ED arrival for CSRS low-risk patients, and within 6 hours for CSRS medium- and high-risk patients. Outpatient cardiac rhythm monitoring for 15 days for selected medium-risk patients and all high-risk patients discharged from the hospital should also be considered.

Perspective:

The CSRS is calculated numerically from several variables: predisposition to vasovagal symptoms, heart disease history, systolic blood pressure <90 or >180 mm Hg, elevated troponin, abnormal QRS axis, QRS duration >130 msec, corrected QT interval >480 msec, and whether vasovagal or cardiac syncope was diagnosed in the ED. The current manuscript suggests that CSRS low-risk patients may be discharged from the ED after 2 hours, and most medium- and high-risk patients may be discharged after 6 hours given appropriate workup. The authors argue in favor of a 15-day outpatient monitoring period for medium-risk patients at a selected threshold and all high-risk patients, and for early application of the ambulatory monitor following syncope, when the yield appears the highest. Notably, the outcomes were censored at 30 days. Additionally, the risk score should not be used in patients presenting after 24 hours following syncope, if syncope lasted >5 minutes, resulted in change in mental status, was an obvious witnessed seizure, intoxication, or if head trauma caused loss of consciousness. The applicability of this paradigm has been validated at Canadian tertiary medical centers, and its usefulness in other patient populations is unknown. Additionally, it relies on ED diagnosis of ‘vasovagal syncope’ or ‘cardiac syncope’ based on the treating ED physician’s early clinical impression, which may be subjective. The manuscript does not directly address which medium- and high-risk patients benefit from hospitalization, and additional studies are clearly needed.

Clinical Topics: Arrhythmias and Clinical EP, Implantable Devices, SCD/Ventricular Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation/Supraventricular Arrhythmias

Keywords: Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Blood Pressure, Emergency Service, Hospital, Electrocardiography, Electrocardiography, Ambulatory, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Patient Discharge, Risk Assessment, Syncope, Syncope, Vasovagal, Troponin


< Back to Listings